qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>, qemu-block@nongnu.org
Cc: kwolf@redhat.com, armbru@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/5] block/backup: Add subclassed notifier
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2016 19:01:24 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <56953F74.2040800@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56953E70.1080406@redhat.com>



On 12/01/2016 18:57, John Snow wrote:
> 
> 
> On 01/12/2016 03:46 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 12/01/2016 01:36, John Snow wrote:
>>> Instead of relying on peeking at bs->job, we want to explicitly get
>>> a reference to the job that was involved in this notifier callback.
>>>
>>> Extend the Notifier to include a job pointer, and include a reference
>>> to the job registering the callback. This cuts out a few more cases
>>> where we have to rely on bs->job.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>
>>
>> Why don't you just put the NotifierWithReturn inside the BackupBlockJob
>> struct, and use container_of to get from NWR to BackupBlockJob?
>>
>> Paolo
>>
> 
> That's another way (including the notifier within the job vs. including
> the job within the notifier.) This one simply occurred to me first. Any
> strong benefit to that method, or just a matter of style?

It's usually the one that is used with notifiers, no other reason.


Paolo

  reply	other threads:[~2016-01-12 18:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-01-12  0:36 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/5] block: reduce reliance on bs->job pointer John Snow
2016-01-12  0:36 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/5] block: Allow mirror_start to return job references John Snow
2016-01-12  0:36 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/5] block: Allow stream_start " John Snow
2016-01-12  0:36 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/5] block: allow backup_start " John Snow
2016-01-12  0:36 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/5] block/backup: Add subclassed notifier John Snow
2016-01-12  8:46   ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-01-12 17:57     ` John Snow
2016-01-12 18:01       ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2016-01-12 18:02         ` John Snow
2016-01-18 14:29           ` Kevin Wolf
2016-01-18 16:20             ` John Snow
2016-01-12  0:36 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 5/5] blockjob: add Job parameter to BlockCompletionFunc John Snow
2016-01-18 14:25   ` Kevin Wolf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=56953F74.2040800@redhat.com \
    --to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=armbru@redhat.com \
    --cc=jsnow@redhat.com \
    --cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).