From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57260) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aJHHb-0005rY-6s for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 13 Jan 2016 04:00:04 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aJHHX-0004Ec-W3 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 13 Jan 2016 03:59:59 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:43889) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aJHHX-0004EQ-Qy for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 13 Jan 2016 03:59:55 -0500 References: <1450168559-9181-1-git-send-email-thuth@redhat.com> <5693D08E.70108@redhat.com> <56947643.2090302@redhat.com> <5694AAAC.7080405@redhat.com> <1763645294.7129685.1452599149096.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> <5695BD3C.10005@redhat.com> <5695C0CE.2020902@redhat.com> <5695FBCD.3030309@redhat.com> From: Jason Wang Message-ID: <56961204.10405@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2016 16:59:48 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <5695FBCD.3030309@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Avocado-devel] [PATCH] net/slirp: Tell the users when they are using deprecated options List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Paolo Bonzini , Cleber Rosa , Thomas Huth Cc: Jan Kiszka , avocado-devel@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Markus Armbruster On 01/13/2016 03:25 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > On 13/01/2016 04:13, Jason Wang wrote: >> Rethinking about this. I'm not quite sure we can remove those >> especially "-net user". Google qemu "-net user" gives about 15,900 >> results (and the first link is qemu wiki). Maybe we can replace "will be >> removed in a future version." with something like "was suggested to use >> -netdev user,XXX" instead? > -net vs. -netdev was a completely separate topic, and I was very much > against removing -net or even listing it as deprecated. Right, I misread the patch. > > "-net channel" seems to be an old version of guestfwd, and I can hardly > find any mention of it on the net. > > Paolo