From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51875)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <lersek@redhat.com>) id 1aJIoN-0002bs-Ul
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 13 Jan 2016 05:37:56 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <lersek@redhat.com>) id 1aJIoN-0001Vd-55
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 13 Jan 2016 05:37:55 -0500
References: <1452578622-4492-1-git-send-email-den@openvz.org>
	<20160112141607.GD4841@noname.redhat.com> <569514E7.8090101@redhat.com>
	<20160112152051.GG4841@noname.redhat.com> <5695201C.2050504@openvz.org>
From: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <569628FB.3020204@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2016 11:37:47 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <5695201C.2050504@openvz.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/1] blk: do not select PFLASH device for
 internal snapshot
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: "Denis V. Lunev" <den@openvz.org>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, Dmitry Andreev <dandreev@virtuozzo.com>, qemu-block@nongnu.org

meta comment here:

On 01/12/16 16:47, Denis V. Lunev wrote:

> P.S. Here is a summary that my colleague has receiver from libvirt
>        list.
> 
> -------- Forwarded Message --------
> Subject: Re: Snapshotting OVMF guests
> Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2016 13:56:29 +0100
> From: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
> To: Dmitry Andreev <dandreev@virtuozzo.com>
> CC: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>, Markus Armbruster
> <armbru@redhat.com>
> 
> Hello Dmitry,
> 
> [...]

Your colleague Dmitry did not receive this from the libvirt list. He
received the from me in private. See the headers above.

Please do not publicize a private exchange without asking for permission
first.

In the present case I don't mind it. I stand by everything I said, and I
would have written mostly the same if I had been contacted publicly,
on-list.

But if you contact me in private *first*, then I expect the discussion
to remain private. If you want to forward the email to a public list,
please ask for permission. Otherwise I might consider it more prudent
for myself to answer all private queries with just "please ask me this
on the list instead".

I appreciate that you guys are working on this, but let's handle emails
sensibly.

Thanks
Laszlo