From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58702)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <den@openvz.org>) id 1aJJLK-0003zj-0S
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 13 Jan 2016 06:11:58 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <den@openvz.org>) id 1aJJLF-0001ST-Tr
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 13 Jan 2016 06:11:57 -0500
References: <1452578622-4492-1-git-send-email-den@openvz.org>
	<20160112141607.GD4841@noname.redhat.com> <569514E7.8090101@redhat.com>
	<20160112152051.GG4841@noname.redhat.com> <5695201C.2050504@openvz.org>
	<569628FB.3020204@redhat.com>
From: "Denis V. Lunev" <den@openvz.org>
Message-ID: <569630EC.5050209@openvz.org>
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2016 14:11:40 +0300
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <569628FB.3020204@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/1] blk: do not select PFLASH device for
 internal snapshot
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, Dmitry Andreev <dandreev@virtuozzo.com>, qemu-block@nongnu.org

On 01/13/2016 01:37 PM, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> meta comment here:
>
> On 01/12/16 16:47, Denis V. Lunev wrote:
>
>> P.S. Here is a summary that my colleague has receiver from libvirt
>>         list.
>>
>> -------- Forwarded Message --------
>> Subject: Re: Snapshotting OVMF guests
>> Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2016 13:56:29 +0100
>> From: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
>> To: Dmitry Andreev <dandreev@virtuozzo.com>
>> CC: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>, Markus Armbruster
>> <armbru@redhat.com>
>>
>> Hello Dmitry,
>>
>> [...]
> Your colleague Dmitry did not receive this from the libvirt list. He
> received the from me in private. See the headers above.
>
> Please do not publicize a private exchange without asking for permission
> first.
>
> In the present case I don't mind it. I stand by everything I said, and I
> would have written mostly the same if I had been contacted publicly,
> on-list.
>
> But if you contact me in private *first*, then I expect the discussion
> to remain private. If you want to forward the email to a public list,
> please ask for permission. Otherwise I might consider it more prudent
> for myself to answer all private queries with just "please ask me this
> on the list instead".
>
> I appreciate that you guys are working on this, but let's handle emails
> sensibly.
>
> Thanks
> Laszlo
>
Sorry :( I have not properly checked the message :(

I am guilty..

Den