Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/1] blk: do not select PFLASH device for internal snapshot

[Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>]

On 01/13/16 12:11, Denis V. Lunev wrote:
> On 01/13/2016 01:37 PM, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>> meta comment here:
>>
>> On 01/12/16 16:47, Denis V. Lunev wrote:
>>
>>> P.S. Here is a summary that my colleague has receiver from libvirt
>>>         list.
>>>
>>> -------- Forwarded Message --------
>>> Subject: Re: Snapshotting OVMF guests
>>> Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2016 13:56:29 +0100
>>> From: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
>>> To: Dmitry Andreev <dandreev@virtuozzo.com>
>>> CC: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>, Markus Armbruster
>>> <armbru@redhat.com>
>>>
>>> Hello Dmitry,
>>>
>>> [...]
>> Your colleague Dmitry did not receive this from the libvirt list. He
>> received the from me in private. See the headers above.
>>
>> Please do not publicize a private exchange without asking for permission
>> first.
>>
>> In the present case I don't mind it. I stand by everything I said, and I
>> would have written mostly the same if I had been contacted publicly,
>> on-list.
>>
>> But if you contact me in private *first*, then I expect the discussion
>> to remain private. If you want to forward the email to a public list,
>> please ask for permission. Otherwise I might consider it more prudent
>> for myself to answer all private queries with just "please ask me this
>> on the list instead".
>>
>> I appreciate that you guys are working on this, but let's handle emails
>> sensibly.
>>
>> Thanks
>> Laszlo
>>
> Sorry :( I have not properly checked the message :(
> 
> I am guilty..

No prob, it's just that I've burned myself a few times before, hence
I've grown to double check the address list when receiving & sending email.

"List address not present" implies "other guy wants it to be private" to
me. :)

Cheers
Laszlo