From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46577) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aLMM8-0001Fs-TA for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 18 Jan 2016 21:49:17 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aLMM8-0004s7-0n for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 18 Jan 2016 21:49:16 -0500 References: <1452764448-17953-1-git-send-email-mst@redhat.com> <569C8B29.4040300@redhat.com> <569C9E87.2030001@redhat.com> <569CB702.1060803@redhat.com> From: Jason Wang Message-ID: <569DA419.3030601@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 10:48:57 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-arm] [PATCH] cadence_gem: fix buffer overflow List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Alistair Francis , Peter Maydell Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" , "qemu-devel@nongnu.org Developers" , Prasad Pandit , Peter Crosthwaite , qemu-arm , =?UTF-8?B?5YiY5Luk?= On 01/19/2016 12:54 AM, Alistair Francis wrote: > On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 2:06 AM, Peter Maydell wrote: >> On 18 January 2016 at 09:57, Jason Wang wrote: >>> Thanks for the pointer. >>> >>> In section 16.1.5, it said >>> >>> "Jumbo frames are not supported." >>> >>> So it was in fact not an unimplemented feature? > I'd say this should be a guest error then. Unless anyone who knows > Ethernet well thinks otherwise? > > Thanks, > > Alistair Yes, agree. > >> I have a vague feeling from the last time I looked at something like >> this that what often happens is the hardware happily goes on dumping >> data out on the wire but this is a violation of the ethernet protocol, >> ie a guest error. But I'm no ethernet expert... >> >> thanks >> -- PMM >>