From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
To: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] arm64: kernel: fix architected PMU registers unconditional access
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2016 18:17:49 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56A2E2CD.80904@roeck-us.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1452696603-27611-1-git-send-email-lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
On 01/13/2016 06:50 AM, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> The Performance Monitors extension is an optional feature of the
> AArch64 architecture, therefore, in order to access Performance
> Monitors registers safely, the kernel should detect the architected
> PMU unit presence through the ID_AA64DFR0_EL1 register PMUVer field
> before accessing them.
>
> This patch implements a guard by reading the ID_AA64DFR0_EL1 register
> PMUVer field to detect the architected PMU presence and prevent accessing
> PMU system registers if the Performance Monitors extension is not
> implemented in the core.
>
> Fixes: 60792ad349f3 ("arm64: kernel: enforce pmuserenr_el0 initialization and restore")
> Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
> Reported-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
> Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
> Cc: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Hi,
this patch is still missing in mainline.
Did it get lost ?
Thanks,
Guenter
> ---
> v1 -> v2
>
> - Updated the PMUVer field conditional check to take into account
> future PMU versions
>
> v1: http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2016-January/398090.html
>
> Will,
>
> rebased on top of mainline, we should be tagging stable before merging.
>
> It applies to current mainline (commit 67990608c8b9).
>
> Tested on Juno and QEMU.
>
> Thanks,
> Lorenzo
>
> arch/arm64/kernel/head.S | 5 +++++
> arch/arm64/mm/proc-macros.S | 12 ++++++++++++
> arch/arm64/mm/proc.S | 4 ++--
> 3 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/head.S b/arch/arm64/kernel/head.S
> index ffe9c2b..917d981 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/head.S
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/head.S
> @@ -514,9 +514,14 @@ CPU_LE( movk x0, #0x30d0, lsl #16 ) // Clear EE and E0E on LE systems
> #endif
>
> /* EL2 debug */
> + mrs x0, id_aa64dfr0_el1 // Check ID_AA64DFR0_EL1 PMUVer
> + sbfx x0, x0, #8, #4
> + cmp x0, #1
> + b.lt 4f // Skip if no PMU present
> mrs x0, pmcr_el0 // Disable debug access traps
> ubfx x0, x0, #11, #5 // to EL2 and allow access to
> msr mdcr_el2, x0 // all PMU counters from EL1
> +4:
>
> /* Stage-2 translation */
> msr vttbr_el2, xzr
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/proc-macros.S b/arch/arm64/mm/proc-macros.S
> index 146bd99..e6a30e1 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/proc-macros.S
> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/proc-macros.S
> @@ -84,3 +84,15 @@
> b.lo 9998b
> dsb \domain
> .endm
> +
> +/*
> + * reset_pmuserenr_el0 - reset PMUSERENR_EL0 if PMUv3 present
> + */
> + .macro reset_pmuserenr_el0, tmpreg
> + mrs \tmpreg, id_aa64dfr0_el1 // Check ID_AA64DFR0_EL1 PMUVer
> + sbfx \tmpreg, \tmpreg, #8, #4
> + cmp \tmpreg, #1 // Skip if no PMU present
> + b.lt 9000f
> + msr pmuserenr_el0, xzr // Disable PMU access from EL0
> +9000:
> + .endm
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/proc.S b/arch/arm64/mm/proc.S
> index a3d867e..c164d2c 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/proc.S
> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/proc.S
> @@ -117,7 +117,7 @@ ENTRY(cpu_do_resume)
> */
> ubfx x11, x11, #1, #1
> msr oslar_el1, x11
> - msr pmuserenr_el0, xzr // Disable PMU access from EL0
> + reset_pmuserenr_el0 x0 // Disable PMU access from EL0
> mov x0, x12
> dsb nsh // Make sure local tlb invalidation completed
> isb
> @@ -154,7 +154,7 @@ ENTRY(__cpu_setup)
> msr cpacr_el1, x0 // Enable FP/ASIMD
> mov x0, #1 << 12 // Reset mdscr_el1 and disable
> msr mdscr_el1, x0 // access to the DCC from EL0
> - msr pmuserenr_el0, xzr // Disable PMU access from EL0
> + reset_pmuserenr_el0 x0 // Disable PMU access from EL0
> /*
> * Memory region attributes for LPAE:
> *
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-23 2:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-13 14:50 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] arm64: kernel: fix architected PMU registers unconditional access Lorenzo Pieralisi
2016-01-23 2:17 ` Guenter Roeck [this message]
2016-01-25 9:36 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56A2E2CD.80904@roeck-us.net \
--to=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).