From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49917) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aNiV8-0005Jd-Aj for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 25 Jan 2016 09:52:19 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aNiV6-0000gs-4D for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 25 Jan 2016 09:52:18 -0500 Received: from mail-wm0-x234.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c09::234]:32856) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aNiV4-0000gd-R1 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 25 Jan 2016 09:52:16 -0500 Received: by mail-wm0-x234.google.com with SMTP id 123so68729640wmz.0 for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2016 06:52:14 -0800 (PST) References: <1453130204-655-1-git-send-email-eric.auger@linaro.org> <1453130204-655-7-git-send-email-eric.auger@linaro.org> <56A62CAD.50405@linaro.org> From: Eric Auger Message-ID: <56A6368C.5000409@linaro.org> Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2016 15:51:56 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 6/8] hw/arm/sysbus-fdt: helpers for clock node generation List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Peter Maydell Cc: Baptiste Reynal , Thomas Huth , eric.auger@st.com, Patch Tracking , Peter Crosthwaite , QEMU Developers , Alex Williamson , qemu-arm , Suravee Suthikulpanit , Paolo Bonzini , thomas.lendacky@amd.com, =?UTF-8?Q?Alex_Benn=c3=a9e?= , Christoffer Dall , David Gibson On 01/25/2016 03:43 PM, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 25 January 2016 at 14:34, Peter Maydell wrote: >> On 25 January 2016 at 14:09, Eric Auger wrote: >>> Hi Peter, >>> On 01/25/2016 03:05 PM, Peter Maydell wrote: >>>> On 18 January 2016 at 15:16, Eric Auger wrote: >> >>>> Don't we want to return here, rather than continuing with the >>>> rest of the function? ("goto err;" with an err: label before >>>> the g_free() at the bottom of the function probably best since >>>> some of the error paths need to free that.) >>> due to the &error_fatal, we are going to exit here. I thought it is not >>> worth going further if we can't find the clock node. >> >> Yes, sorry, I didn't notice the error_fatal til I got to about >> the last patch I reviewed. You can ignore similar comments >> I made about some of the other patches. > > ...so if you fix the 'asserts' comment thing, you can have > Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell OK thanks for the whole review Eric > > thanks > -- PMM >