From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38156)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <pbonzini@redhat.com>) id 1aOkOJ-0002Sm-U4
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 28 Jan 2016 06:05:32 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <pbonzini@redhat.com>) id 1aOkOG-0008A1-2n
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 28 Jan 2016 06:05:31 -0500
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:33080)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <pbonzini@redhat.com>) id 1aOkOF-00089h-TI
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 28 Jan 2016 06:05:27 -0500
References: <1453728801-5398-1-git-send-email-stefanha@redhat.com>
	<20160128104007.GA7206@stefanha-x1.localdomain>
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <56A9F5F2.3030506@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2016 12:05:22 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20160128104007.GA7206@stefanha-x1.localdomain>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2] dataplane: RCU dirty memory bitmap for
 safe RAM hotplug
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@gmail.com>, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256



On 28/01/2016 11:40, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> Paolo, will you take this through your tree/dataplane branch?
> 
> I think that would work well since your vring.c removal relies on 
> the memory API being thread-safe.

Yes, I'll ensure this gets in before I post the vring.c removal.

I have already reviewed it, but not tested it.

Paolo
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJWqfXwAAoJEL/70l94x66DqrgIAI04mitSSu5lY0LzIz8WmewU
04jSj3eVpUfHWhnksGTciwBultpI8VvVUmihip8d26F9qdDnbbXe5ZZTiT7LWK4L
I3cvaWTl++mJQ40AE+aHG4Imq+rjrqPWhFYBUn2hmYpaxGzyrpDryet6uyEkzQt6
b2ZUicDzDD+qkInqpycPSJl7mEvOnbSSLeeVWCRReXPGxJCqATPMETpTJ0NrMWez
pP0ebtEKOTd5OqiUmB5ajyI1Lfia3ePcaOI9RDf+BVPCedhRez7XDRu+t1xACDWm
ofCxO/3/x2GxRB6yNgMj8K5jW9xGrHbYpRu1w5mb84ygY78z6F0ubfDqhdP/Gb8=
=vp25
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----