From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39436) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aQXSt-0006bI-NQ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 02 Feb 2016 04:41:40 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aQXSo-0005tR-NM for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 02 Feb 2016 04:41:39 -0500 Received: from mail-wm0-x244.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c09::244]:34190) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aQXSo-0005tF-Fq for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 02 Feb 2016 04:41:34 -0500 Received: by mail-wm0-x244.google.com with SMTP id p63so1535308wmp.1 for ; Tue, 02 Feb 2016 01:41:34 -0800 (PST) Sender: Paolo Bonzini References: <1452870739-28484-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> From: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: <56B079CA.2020005@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2016 10:41:30 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1452870739-28484-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 00/16] aio: first part of aio_context_acquire/release pushdown List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: stefanha@redhat.com On 15/01/2016 16:12, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > This is the infrastructure part of the aio_context_acquire/release pushdown, > which in turn is the first step towards a real multiqueue block layer in > QEMU. The next step is to touch all the drivers and move calls to the > aio_context_acquire/release functions from aio-*.c to the drivers. This > will be done in a separate patch series. > > While the inserted lines are a lot, more than half of it are in documentation > and formal models of the code, as well as in the implementation of the new > "lockcnt" synchronization primitive. The code is also very heavily commented. > > The first four patches are new, as the issue they fix was found after posting > the previous patch. Everything else is more or less the same as before. Ping? Paolo