From: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
To: "Gerd Hoffmann" <kraxel@redhat.com>,
"Marc Marí" <marc.mari.barcelo@gmail.com>
Cc: "Gabriel L. Somlo" <somlo@cmu.edu>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "Kevin O'Connor" <kevin@koconnor.net>,
"Stefan Hajnoczi" <stefanha@redhat.com>,
"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"Marc Marí" <markmb@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4] Add optionrom compatible with fw_cfg DMA version
Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2016 16:04:58 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56B0C59A.6070008@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1454423012.9300.99.camel@redhat.com>
On 02/02/16 15:23, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> I don't remember discussing the topic of machine types when touching
>> fw_cfg DMA. Which means, it probably slipped amongst the other details.
>> But it is now merged and in stable, so it should probably be left as it
>> is now.
>
> We have to fix it, it breaks live migration. With fw_cfg_dma turned on
> we send an extra vmstate section. qemu 2.4 (+older) will not understand
> it. So we have to turn it off for those machine types.
>
> dma_enabled property is there already, but the logic is wrong. It
> defaults to false, but is flipped to true when the arch supports dma
> (i.e. on x86 and arm), unconditionally. Instead it should default to
> true. When set to false by the user or compat properties don't enable
> fw_cfg dma (and also flip it to false when dma is not supported by the
> arch).
I think the "dma_enabled" property is not exposed to the user. It is
internal to the fw_cfg implementation. The only reason we use a property
for this purpose because we want to pass a parameter to realize(), and
that's only possible via properties.
The default value of "dma_enabled" in both fw_cfg_io_properties and
fw_cfg_mem_properties is irrelevant; the actual property value is always
overwritten in fw_cfg_init_io_dma() and fw_cfg_init_mem_wide(), which
all of the init paths go through.
I agree that DMA capability should be filtered with machine type.
However, that distinction should not be made using the current
"dma_enabled" properties (i.e., of "fw_cfg_io_properties" and
"fw_cfg_mem_properties". Instead, it should be made in the
board-specific callers of fw_cfg_init_(io_dma|mem_wide). Those functions
are:
- create_fw_cfg() [hw/arm/virt.c]
- bochs_bios_init() [hw/i386/pc.c]
It looks like aarch64 virt machine types are not versioned yet, so that
leaves us with bochs_bios_init().
bochs_bios_init() is called by pc_memory_init(), and pc_memory_init() at
last has knowledge of machine type knobs -- it takes both "pcms" and
"guest_info".
"pcms" seems to handle the -machine options, but controlling this
feature from the command line is not really a goal here. Whereas machine
type compat flags arrive through "guest_info".
So I think we need the following:
- a new boolean field in PCMachineClass (not PCMachineState) called
"fw_cfg_dma_disabled"
- In the pc_i440fx_2_4_machine_options() and
pc_q35_2_4_machine_options() functions, this should be set to "true"
- The same field should be added to PcGuestInfo
- The pc_init1() and pc_q35_init() functions should copy the field from
*pcmc to *guest_info
- The pc_memory_init() function should pass
guest_info->fw_cfg_dma_disabled to bochs_bios_init()
- bochs_bios_init() should call fw_cfg_init_io() if the flag is "true".
Thanks
Laszlo
>> Should this optionrom be enabled only with the latest machine type?
>
> The logic to pick the correct rom is fine.
>
> cheers,
> Gerd
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-02-02 15:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-29 11:12 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4] Add optionrom compatible with fw_cfg DMA version Marc Marí
2016-01-29 15:25 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2016-02-02 11:06 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2016-02-02 12:04 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2016-02-02 13:07 ` Marc Marí
2016-02-02 14:23 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2016-02-02 15:04 ` Laszlo Ersek [this message]
2016-02-03 8:44 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2016-02-03 11:48 ` Laszlo Ersek
2016-02-03 12:57 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2016-02-02 12:58 ` Marc Marí
2016-02-03 9:47 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2016-02-22 11:56 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2016-02-23 9:51 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2016-03-21 11:14 ` Richard W.M. Jones
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56B0C59A.6070008@redhat.com \
--to=lersek@redhat.com \
--cc=kevin@koconnor.net \
--cc=kraxel@redhat.com \
--cc=marc.mari.barcelo@gmail.com \
--cc=markmb@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=somlo@cmu.edu \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).