From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>,
"Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@redhat.com>
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-block@nongnu.org,
Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/2] qapi: Allow blockdev-add for NBD
Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2016 13:01:44 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56B33DA8.8000900@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56B235F2.1050005@redhat.com>
On 03/02/2016 18:16, Max Reitz wrote:
> However, the issue remains that the NBD block driver expects
> flattened options which is syntactically incompatible to
> SocketAddress. Maybe the best way to address this would be to just
> make block/nbd.c directly accept a SocketAddress and keep the old
> flattened @host, @port, and @path options only as a legacy mapping
> to inet.host, inet.port, and unix.path.
Do we need to keep them at all? The URL-based file is already good
enough as a shortcut for human and command-line use. Is anyone
actually using host/port/path?
Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-02-04 12:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-03 16:33 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2] qapi: Allow blockdev-add for NBD Max Reitz
2016-02-03 16:33 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] block/nbd: Reject port parameter without host Max Reitz
2016-02-03 16:38 ` Eric Blake
2016-02-03 16:39 ` Max Reitz
2016-02-03 16:33 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/2] qapi: Allow blockdev-add for NBD Max Reitz
2016-02-03 16:48 ` Eric Blake
2016-02-03 17:00 ` Max Reitz
2016-02-04 11:58 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-02-03 17:06 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2016-02-03 17:16 ` Max Reitz
2016-02-04 12:01 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2016-02-04 13:08 ` Kevin Wolf
2016-02-04 13:19 ` Daniel P. Berrange
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56B33DA8.8000900@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).