From: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
To: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Michael Roth <mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v10 04/13] qapi: Drop pointless gotos in generated code
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 10:14:50 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56C3590A.6000208@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87h9h8pqn3.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2044 bytes --]
On 02/16/2016 09:27 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> writes:
>
>> There's no point in emitting a goto if the very next thing
>> emitted will be the label. A bit of cleverness in gen_visit_fields()
>> will let us choose when to omit a final error check (basically,
>> swap the order of emitted text within the loop, with the error
>> check omitted on the first pass, then checking whether to emit a
>> final check after the loop); and in turn omit unused labels.
>>
>> The change to generated code is a bit easier because we split out
>> the reindentation of the remaining gotos in the previous patch.
>> For example, in visit_type_ChardevReturn_fields():
>>
>> | if (visit_optional(v, "pty", &obj->has_pty)) {
>> | visit_type_str(v, "pty", &obj->pty, &err);
>> | }
>> |- if (err) {
>> |- goto out;
>> |- }
>> |-
>> |-out:
>> | error_propagate(errp, err);
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
>>
>> @@ -1679,8 +1682,9 @@ def gen_visit_fields(members, prefix='', need_cast=False, skiperr=False,
>> ret += mcgen('''
>> }
>> ''')
>> +
>> + if members and not skiplast:
>> ret += gen_err_check(skiperr=skiperr, label=label)
>> -
>> return ret
>
> Is saving a goto the compiler can easily eliminate worth complicating
> the code?
I'm fine with dropping 3 and 4/13 if you think they don't add anything
(and they do indeed make it more complicated to reason about when it is
safe to drop a goto, and furthermore when to omit the label because all
gotos were dropped). The generated code will occupy more source code
bytes, but as you say, the optimizing compiler should not be bloating
the code any differently based on whether the goto is present or absent.
Okay, just in typing that, you've convinced me - ease of maintenance
should triumph over concise generated code.
--
Eric Blake eblake redhat com +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 604 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-02-16 17:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-16 0:20 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v10 00/13] prune some QAPI visitor cruft (was qapi cleanups subset E) Eric Blake
2016-02-16 0:20 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v10 01/13] qapi: Simplify excess input reporting in input visitors Eric Blake
2016-02-16 0:20 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v10 02/13] qapi: Forbid empty unions and useless alternates Eric Blake
2016-02-16 16:08 ` Markus Armbruster
2016-02-16 23:18 ` Eric Blake
2016-02-16 0:20 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v10 03/13] qapi: Reposition error checks in gen_visit_fields() Eric Blake
2016-02-16 0:20 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v10 04/13] qapi: Drop pointless gotos in generated code Eric Blake
2016-02-16 16:27 ` Markus Armbruster
2016-02-16 17:14 ` Eric Blake [this message]
2016-02-16 0:20 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v10 05/13] qapi-visit: Simplify how we visit common union members Eric Blake
2016-02-16 16:31 ` Markus Armbruster
2016-02-16 17:17 ` Eric Blake
2016-02-16 0:20 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v10 06/13] qapi-visit: Unify struct and union visit Eric Blake
2016-02-16 0:20 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v10 07/13] qapi-visit: Less indirection in visit_type_Foo_fields() Eric Blake
2016-02-16 0:20 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v10 08/13] qapi: Adjust layout of FooList types Eric Blake
2016-02-16 16:55 ` Markus Armbruster
2016-02-16 0:20 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v10 09/13] qapi: Emit structs used as variants in topological order Eric Blake
2016-02-16 17:03 ` Markus Armbruster
2016-02-16 17:32 ` Eric Blake
2016-02-16 21:00 ` Markus Armbruster
2016-02-16 0:20 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v10 10/13] qapi: Don't box struct branch of alternate Eric Blake
2016-02-16 19:07 ` Markus Armbruster
2016-02-16 19:53 ` Eric Blake
2016-02-17 14:40 ` Markus Armbruster
2016-02-17 20:34 ` Eric Blake
2016-02-18 8:21 ` Markus Armbruster
2016-02-16 0:20 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v10 11/13] qapi: Don't box branches of flat unions Eric Blake
2016-02-17 17:44 ` Markus Armbruster
2016-02-17 20:53 ` Eric Blake
2016-02-18 8:51 ` Markus Armbruster
2016-02-18 16:51 ` Eric Blake
2016-02-18 17:11 ` Markus Armbruster
2016-02-16 0:20 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v10 12/13] qapi: Delete unused visit_start_union() Eric Blake
2016-02-17 18:08 ` Markus Armbruster
2016-02-17 21:19 ` Eric Blake
2016-02-18 8:24 ` Markus Armbruster
2016-02-18 16:47 ` Eric Blake
2016-02-16 0:20 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v10 13/13] qapi: Change visit_start_implicit_struct to visit_start_alternate Eric Blake
2016-02-17 18:13 ` Markus Armbruster
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56C3590A.6000208@redhat.com \
--to=eblake@redhat.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).