From: "Denis V. Lunev" <den@openvz.org>
To: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
Cc: "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"Richard Henderson" <rth@twiddle.net>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "Andreas Färber" <afaerber@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 1/1] hyperv: cpu hotplug fix with HyperV enabled
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 19:50:59 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56C5F673.5040701@openvz.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160217203105.GA14502@thinpad.lan.raisama.net>
On 02/17/2016 11:31 PM, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 03:00:15PM +0300, Denis V. Lunev wrote:
>> With Hyper-V enabled CPU hotplug stops working. The CPU appears in device
>> manager on Windows but does not appear in peformance monitor and control
>> panel.
>>
>> The root of the problem is the following. Windows checks
>> HV_X64_CPU_DYNAMIC_PARTITIONING_AVAILABLE bit in CPUID. The presence of
>> this bit is enough to cure the situation.
> What about live migration? This is going to change CPUID data
> under the guest's feet.
>
>> The bit should be set when CPU hotplug is allowed for HyperV VM. The check
>> that hot_add_cpu callback is defined is enough from the protocol point
>> of view. Though this callback is defined almost always thus there is no
>> need to export that knowledge in the other way.
> What would be the consequences of setting it when CPU hotplug is
> not available? Is there any real advantage of keeping it unset in
> pc-1.4 and older?
>
> If there are good reasons to keep it unset if CPU hotplug is not
> possible, why set it when max_cpus == smp_cpus?
I have made some tests with Win2k12 and the picture matches my
expectations. This property is read from CPUID once at system
boot:
- hotplug is working for VM with this property set after migration
to QEMU which does not support this property
- hotplug remains not working after migration to QEMU which
sets this property
No side effects detected but I have not checked that a lot.
I have discussed this thing with our local Windows experts and
they do not know side-effects of this.
Thus I think that we could set this unconditionally.
Any objections?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-02-18 16:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-13 12:00 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 1/1] hyperv: cpu hotplug fix with HyperV enabled Denis V. Lunev
2016-02-17 15:08 ` Denis V. Lunev
2016-02-17 20:31 ` Eduardo Habkost
2016-02-18 16:50 ` Denis V. Lunev [this message]
2016-02-18 17:47 ` Eduardo Habkost
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56C5F673.5040701@openvz.org \
--to=den@openvz.org \
--cc=afaerber@suse.de \
--cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=rth@twiddle.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).