From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40644) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aXwyf-0003sY-Qw for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 15:21:06 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aXwyc-0007nx-Ky for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 15:21:05 -0500 Received: from mail-ph.de-nserver.de ([85.158.179.214]:50062) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aXwyc-0007ix-AD for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 15:21:02 -0500 From: Stefan Priebe Message-ID: <56CB6DC2.8040106@profihost.ag> Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 21:21:22 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [Qemu-devel] drive-backup List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel Cc: Timo Grodzinski Hello, is there any chance or hack to work with a bigger cluster size for the drive backup job? See: http://git.qemu.org/?p=qemu.git;a=blob;f=block/backup.c;h=16105d40b193be9bb40346027bdf58e62b956a96;hb=98d2c6f2cd80afaa2dc10091f5e35a97c181e4f5 This is very slow with ceph - may be due to the 64k block size. I would like to check whether this is faster with cephs native block size of 4mb. Greets, Stefan