qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>
Cc: stefanha@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
	qemu-block@nongnu.org, qemu-stable@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] qed: fix bdrv_qed_drain
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 14:54:02 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <56CC647A.6020803@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160223124956.GA26812@ad.usersys.redhat.com>



On 23/02/2016 13:49, Fam Zheng wrote:
> On Tue, 02/23 11:43, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 23/02/2016 06:57, Fam Zheng wrote:
>>>>>> +        qed_cancel_need_check_timer(s);
>>>>>> +        qed_need_check_timer_cb(s);
>>>>>> +    }
>>>>>
>>>>> What if an allocating write is queued (the else branch case)? Its completion
>>>>> will be in bdrv_drain and it could arm the need_check_timer which is wrong.
>>>>>
>>>>> We need to drain the allocating_write_reqs queue before checking the timer.
>>>>
>>>> You're right, but how?  That's what bdrv_drain(bs) does, it's a
>>>> chicken-and-egg problem.
>>>
>>> Maybe use an aio_poll loop before the if?
>>
>> That would not change the fact that you're reimplementing bdrv_drain
>> inside bdrv_qed_drain.
> 
> But it fulfills the contract of .bdrv_drain. This is the easy way, the hard way
> would be iterating through the allocating_write_reqs list and process reqs one
> by one synchronously, which still involves aio_poll indirectly.

The easy way would be better then.

Stefan, any second opinion?

Paolo

>> Perhaps for now it's simplest to just remove the QED .bdrv_drain
>> callback, if you think this patch is not a good stopgap measure to avoid
>> the segmentation faults.
> 
> OK, I'm fine with this as a stopgap measure.
> 
>> Once the bdrv_drain rework is in, we can move the callback _after_ I/O
>> is drained on bs and before it is drained on bs->file->bs.
> 
> Sounds good.

  reply	other threads:[~2016-02-23 13:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-02-16 15:53 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] qed: fix bdrv_qed_drain Paolo Bonzini
2016-02-17  2:57 ` Fam Zheng
2016-02-17 11:28   ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-02-23  5:57     ` Fam Zheng
2016-02-23 10:43       ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-02-23 12:49         ` Fam Zheng
2016-02-23 13:54           ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2016-03-07 16:57             ` [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-block] " Kevin Wolf
2016-03-07 20:56               ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2016-03-07 21:22                 ` [Qemu-devel] " Paolo Bonzini
2016-03-08  9:52                   ` [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-block] " Stefan Hajnoczi
2016-03-08  9:59                     ` Kevin Wolf
2016-03-08  9:58                 ` Kevin Wolf
2016-03-09 15:37                   ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2016-03-07 20:57               ` Stefan Hajnoczi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=56CC647A.6020803@redhat.com \
    --to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=famz@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-stable@nongnu.org \
    --cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).