From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44189) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aYrTW-00089c-8C for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 25 Feb 2016 03:40:42 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aYrTT-0004yP-0O for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 25 Feb 2016 03:40:42 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:55213) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aYrTS-0004yD-L7 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 25 Feb 2016 03:40:38 -0500 References: <87mvqr7865.fsf@emacs.mitica> From: Thomas Huth Message-ID: <56CEBE02.6090200@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2016 09:40:34 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <87mvqr7865.fsf@emacs.mitica> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] KVM call for agenda for 2016-03-01 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: quintela@redhat.com, KVM devel mailing list , QEMU Developer Cc: pkrempa@redhat.com, Eduardo Habkost , Bharata B Rao , Igor Mammedov , David Gibson , =?UTF-8?Q?Andreas_F=c3=a4rber?= On 23.02.2016 16:33, Juan Quintela wrote: >=20 > Hi >=20 > Please, send any topic that you are interested in covering. >=20 > At the end of Monday I will send an email with the agenda or the > cancellation of the call, so hurry up. Shall we talk about CPU hotplug again? There are a lot of discussions going on, but as far as I can tell, it seems there is still no 100% common understanding yet how the final solution should really look like..= . Thomas