From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52863) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ad6gH-0003Wf-D0 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 07 Mar 2016 20:43:26 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ad6gD-0003GA-Jy for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 07 Mar 2016 20:43:23 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:36401) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ad6gD-0003Fo-Ed for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 07 Mar 2016 20:43:21 -0500 References: <56DD279D.4020404@redhat.com> <20160307113816.GE5169@var.bordeaux.inria.fr> From: Jason Wang Message-ID: <56DE2E29.6040208@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2016 09:43:05 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160307113816.GE5169@var.bordeaux.inria.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCHv9 06/10] slirp: Reindent after refactoring List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Samuel Thibault Cc: Thomas Huth , zhanghailiang , Li Zhijian , Stefan Hajnoczi , Dave Gilbert , Vasiliy Tolstov , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Gonglei , Jan Kiszka , Huangpeng , Guillaume Subiron On 03/07/2016 07:38 PM, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Jason Wang, on Mon 07 Mar 2016 15:02:53 +0800, wrote: >> On 02/23/2016 03:28 AM, Samuel Thibault wrote: >>> From: Guillaume Subiron >>> >>> No code change. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Guillaume Subiron >>> Signed-off-by: Samuel Thibault >>> Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth >>> --- >>> slirp/tcp_input.c | 92 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------- >>> slirp/tcp_output.c | 29 +++++++++-------- >>> slirp/tcp_subr.c | 50 ++++++++++++++--------------- >> How about other files in slirp/ ? > What do you mean? This patch is just meant to reindent the code after > 'if's and 'case's have been added without reindentation to make it more > readable. > > Do you mean reindenting the whole slirp? That's quite another work... > > Samuel > I'm asking since I'm not sure partial reindenting is a the best choice for us. The patch itself is ok.