From: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
To: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Michael Roth <mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 01/10] qapi: Assert in places where variants are not handled
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2016 08:49:52 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56DEF4A0.8030707@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87ziu9b7ns.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2041 bytes --]
On 03/08/2016 03:12 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> writes:
>
>> We are getting closer to the point where we could use one union
>> as the base or variant type within another union type (as long
>> as there are no collisions between any possible combination of
>> member names allowed across all discriminator choices). But
>> until we get to that point, it is worth asserting that variants
>> are not present in places where we are not prepared to handle
>> them: base types must still be plain structs, and anywhere we
>> explode a struct into a parameter list (events and command
>> marshalling), we don't support variants in that explosion.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
>>
>> +++ b/scripts/qapi.py
>> @@ -960,6 +960,7 @@ class QAPISchemaObjectType(QAPISchemaType):
>> assert isinstance(self.base, QAPISchemaObjectType)
>> self.base.check(schema)
>> self.base.check_clash(schema, self.info, seen)
>> + assert not self.base.variants
>
> I'd move this two lines up, so it's next to the isinstance.
>
> Assertions in .check() are place-holders for semantic checks that
> haven't been moved from the old semantic analysis to the classes.
> Whenever we add one, we should double-check the old semantic analysis
> catches whatever we assert. For object types, that's check_struct() and
> check_union(). Both check_type() the base with allow_metas=['struct']),
> so we're good.
>
> Inconsistency: you add the check for base, but not for variants.
>
> On closer look, adding it for either is actually redundant, because
> se.f.base.check_clash() already asserts it, with a nice "not
> implemented" comment.
>
> If we think asserting twice is useful for base, then it's useful for
> variants, too. But I think asserting once suffices.
So basically, we can drop this hunk, right?
--
Eric Blake eblake redhat com +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 604 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-08 15:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-05 16:16 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 00/10] easier unboxed visits/qapi implicit types Eric Blake
2016-03-05 16:16 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 01/10] qapi: Assert in places where variants are not handled Eric Blake
2016-03-08 10:12 ` Markus Armbruster
2016-03-08 15:49 ` Eric Blake [this message]
2016-03-08 17:46 ` Markus Armbruster
2016-03-05 16:16 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 02/10] qapi: Fix command with named empty argument type Eric Blake
2016-03-05 16:16 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 03/10] qapi: Make c_type() more OO-like Eric Blake
2016-03-08 10:54 ` Markus Armbruster
2016-03-08 15:50 ` Eric Blake
2016-03-05 16:16 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 04/10] qapi: Emit implicit structs in generated C Eric Blake
2016-03-08 14:24 ` Markus Armbruster
2016-03-08 16:03 ` Eric Blake
2016-03-08 19:09 ` Markus Armbruster
2016-03-09 5:42 ` Eric Blake
2016-03-09 7:23 ` Markus Armbruster
2016-03-05 16:16 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 05/10] qapi: Utilize implicit struct visits Eric Blake
2016-03-08 15:10 ` Markus Armbruster
2016-03-08 16:11 ` Eric Blake
2016-03-08 18:09 ` Markus Armbruster
2016-03-08 18:28 ` Eric Blake
2016-03-08 19:21 ` Markus Armbruster
2016-03-09 23:28 ` Eric Blake
2016-03-05 16:16 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 06/10] qapi-commands: Inline single-use helpers of gen_marshal() Eric Blake
2016-03-05 16:16 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 07/10] qapi: Don't special-case simple union wrappers Eric Blake
2016-03-08 15:59 ` Markus Armbruster
2016-03-08 16:16 ` Eric Blake
2016-03-08 18:10 ` Markus Armbruster
2016-03-05 16:16 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 08/10] qapi: Allow anonymous base for flat union Eric Blake
2016-03-08 16:23 ` Markus Armbruster
2016-03-08 16:29 ` Eric Blake
2016-03-08 18:14 ` Markus Armbruster
2016-03-05 16:16 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 09/10] qapi: Use anonymous bases in QMP flat unions Eric Blake
2016-03-05 16:16 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 10/10] qapi: Populate info['name'] for each entity Eric Blake
2016-03-08 16:46 ` Markus Armbruster
2016-03-08 16:59 ` Eric Blake
2016-03-08 19:14 ` Markus Armbruster
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56DEF4A0.8030707@redhat.com \
--to=eblake@redhat.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).