From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59692) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1adbE0-0001Ee-Ir for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 09 Mar 2016 05:20:17 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1adbDx-00011V-B8 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 09 Mar 2016 05:20:16 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:53181) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1adbDx-000110-5U for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 09 Mar 2016 05:20:13 -0500 From: Laszlo Ersek Message-ID: <56DFF8DA.2070408@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2016 11:20:10 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [Qemu-devel] why restrict pull reqs to signed tags? List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Peter Maydell Cc: "Jordan Justen (Intel address)" , David Woodhouse , qemu devel list , Ard Biesheuvel Hi, the question in the subject is not loaded, it is not trying to suggest the opposite. It's a genuine question. If you have a few (tens of) minutes, please read through this sub-thread (or the entire discussion): http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.bios.edk2.devel/8864/focus=8898 See also http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1855303/focus=2172858 Thanks Laszlo