From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52295) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1adcMn-0002hk-U9 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 09 Mar 2016 06:33:27 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1adcMk-0005Is-P3 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 09 Mar 2016 06:33:25 -0500 Received: from mail-wm0-x235.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c09::235]:38409) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1adcMk-0005IL-IG for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 09 Mar 2016 06:33:22 -0500 Received: by mail-wm0-x235.google.com with SMTP id l68so66640677wml.1 for ; Wed, 09 Mar 2016 03:33:22 -0800 (PST) Sender: Paolo Bonzini References: <56DFF8DA.2070408@redhat.com> From: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: <56E009FF.3070204@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2016 12:33:19 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <56DFF8DA.2070408@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] why restrict pull reqs to signed tags? List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Laszlo Ersek , Peter Maydell Cc: "Jordan Justen (Intel address)" , David Woodhouse , qemu devel list , Ard Biesheuvel On 09/03/2016 11:20, Laszlo Ersek wrote: > Hi, > > the question in the subject is not loaded, it is not trying to suggest > the opposite. It's a genuine question. I think it boils down to this comment in the thread: "Signed pulls are about personal trust. If you have signed emails or a signed pull request from someone you trust sufficiently, you don't *need* to look at the content. There is no difference between email and pull requests, in this respect". Paolo > If you have a few (tens of) minutes, please read through this sub-thread > (or the entire discussion): > > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.bios.edk2.devel/8864/focus=8898 > > See also > > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1855303/focus=2172858