From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60570) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1add5B-0001D7-FW for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 09 Mar 2016 07:19:18 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1add58-0000Vc-A0 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 09 Mar 2016 07:19:17 -0500 Received: from mail-wm0-x233.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c09::233]:37604) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1add58-0000VY-34 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 09 Mar 2016 07:19:14 -0500 Received: by mail-wm0-x233.google.com with SMTP id p65so68308674wmp.0 for ; Wed, 09 Mar 2016 04:19:14 -0800 (PST) Sender: Paolo Bonzini References: <56DFF8DA.2070408@redhat.com> <56E0136E.8050709@redhat.com> From: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: <56E014BF.7060507@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2016 13:19:11 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <56E0136E.8050709@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] why restrict pull reqs to signed tags? List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Laszlo Ersek , Peter Maydell Cc: "Jordan Justen (Intel address)" , David Woodhouse , qemu devel list , Ard Biesheuvel On 09/03/2016 13:13, Laszlo Ersek wrote: > David is proposing that direct pull requests be allowed on edk2-devel, > immediately from contributors, so that the contributor may ask for > his/her exact history to be preserved. I'm looking for examples: high > profile projects that have adopted such a workflow *all the while* > enforcing patch-wise reviews. Thus far I've come up empty. Ironically, projects using github pull requests do this. They do code review through the website and merge with a button. The resulting history is non-linear. Paolo