From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45383)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <lersek@redhat.com>) id 1addwQ-0002Pk-Dz
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 09 Mar 2016 08:14:19 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <lersek@redhat.com>) id 1addwK-000716-Lj
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 09 Mar 2016 08:14:18 -0500
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:51017)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <lersek@redhat.com>) id 1addwK-000710-G2
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 09 Mar 2016 08:14:12 -0500
References: <56DFF8DA.2070408@redhat.com>
	<CAFEAcA_zig+3A4i784Z87ZovMbm60VZytj=apnhxKZnOWibqyw@mail.gmail.com>
	<56E0136E.8050709@redhat.com> <56E014BF.7060507@redhat.com>
	<56E017AF.2090107@redhat.com>
	<1457527086.118898.240.camel@infradead.org>
	<CAKv+Gu9jrUyx8F45R7cxywF4u0_sok4hSHH=p7KbK5xmXg2Akg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAFEAcA-yZg+YYTENcN6t2YJ_vomp9Nve2ax8YHbaFpidh-a5kg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <56E021A1.4060108@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2016 14:14:09 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAFEAcA-yZg+YYTENcN6t2YJ_vomp9Nve2ax8YHbaFpidh-a5kg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] why restrict pull reqs to signed tags?
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>, Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>, qemu devel list <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>, "Jordan Justen (Intel address)" <jordan.l.justen@intel.com>

On 03/09/16 13:44, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 9 March 2016 at 19:40, Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> wrote:
>> Laszlo is going to shoot me for saying this, but as a compromise
>> between the Windows crowd in the Intel firmware team and the more
>> Linux/open source oriented people on the opposite side, using github
>> does not sound like an entirely unreasonable compromise. At least it
>> means no emails anymore with garbled patches and 300 character lines
>> in the commit log
> 
> By the way, why are you all discussing the EDK2 patch workflow
> proposals on qemu-devel and not on an EDK mailing list?

Sorry, that's where we started, and the rest of the discussion should
happen there; I agree. The reason for coming here was that we ended up
questioning / re-examining the practices we had taken as examples: QEMU,
Linux. I needed some info from the source, and I wanted to allow anyone
on qemu-devel to chime in. (This is why I didn't ask only you
personally, edk2-devel CC'd.)

Thanks
Laszlo