qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
To: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Michael Roth <mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 04/14] qapi: Adjust names of implicit types
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2016 09:11:40 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <56E19CBC.90605@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8737rytptn.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1904 bytes --]

On 03/10/2016 06:39 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> writes:
> 
>> The original choice of ':obj-' as the prefix for implicit types
>> made it obvious that we weren't going to clash with any user-defined
>> names.  But now we want to create structs for implicit types.
> 
> Why?  I know, but the commit message should still give a hint.  Perhaps:
> "to get rid of special cases in the generators"?
> 
>>                                                                We
>> could transliterate ':' to '_', except that C99 says that a leading
>> underscore and lower-case letter should be used only for file scope
>> identifiers, while we would be exposing it in qapi-types.h.  So it's
> 
> Misunderstanding!  When the standard says "identifiers that X are
> reserved for Y use", it reserves these identifiers for itself and the
> implementation.  You shouldn't use them for Y then.
> 
> Suggest to simply quote the standard instead of interpreting it:
> ... except that C99 mandates that "identifiers that begin with an
> underscore are always reserved for use as identifiers with file scope in
> both the ordinary and tag name spaces"

Both those changes sound fine.

> 
>> time to change our naming convention; we can instead use the 'q_'
>> prefix that we reserved for ourselves back in commit 9fb081e0.  As
>> long as we don't declare 'empty' or 'obj' ticklish, it shouldn't
>> clash with c_name() prepending 'q_' to the user's ticklish names.
> 
> Do we really want to rename :empty?  We're not going to generate C for
> it, are we?

No, but it was easier to implement .is_implicit() as
"name.startswith('q_')" than as "name == ':empty' or
name.startswith('q_obj')".  I can stick with :empty if you want a
respin, though.

-- 
Eric Blake   eblake redhat com    +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 604 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2016-03-10 16:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-03-10  0:55 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 00/14] easier unboxed visits/qapi implicit types Eric Blake
2016-03-10  0:55 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 01/14] qapi: Assert in places where variants are not handled Eric Blake
2016-03-10  0:55 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 02/14] qapi: Fix command with named empty argument type Eric Blake
2016-03-10  0:55 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 03/14] qapi: Make c_type() more OO-like Eric Blake
2016-03-10  0:55 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 04/14] qapi: Adjust names of implicit types Eric Blake
2016-03-10 13:39   ` Markus Armbruster
2016-03-10 16:11     ` Eric Blake [this message]
2016-03-11  7:48       ` Markus Armbruster
2016-03-11 17:29         ` Eric Blake
2016-03-10  0:55 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 05/14] qapi: Emit implicit structs in generated C Eric Blake
2016-03-10 14:25   ` Markus Armbruster
2016-03-10  0:55 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 06/14] qapi-event: Slightly shrink generated code Eric Blake
2016-03-10 18:50   ` Markus Armbruster
2016-03-10 20:14     ` Eric Blake
2016-03-16 14:41   ` Markus Armbruster
2016-03-10  0:55 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 07/14] qapi: Utilize implicit struct visits Eric Blake
2016-03-10 19:05   ` Markus Armbruster
2016-03-10 20:16     ` Eric Blake
2016-03-16 14:45   ` Markus Armbruster
2016-03-10  0:55 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 08/14] qapi-commands: Inline single-use helpers of gen_marshal() Eric Blake
2016-03-10  0:55 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 09/14] qapi: Inline gen_visit_members() into lone caller Eric Blake
2016-03-10  0:55 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 10/14] qapi: Drop unused c_null() Eric Blake
2016-03-10  0:55 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 11/14] qapi: Don't special-case simple union wrappers Eric Blake
2016-03-10  0:55 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 12/14] qapi: Make BlockdevOptions doc example closer to reality Eric Blake
2016-03-10  0:55 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 13/14] qapi: Allow anonymous base for flat union Eric Blake
2016-03-10 20:22   ` Markus Armbruster
2016-03-10 20:50     ` Eric Blake
2016-03-16 15:21       ` Markus Armbruster
2016-03-10  0:55 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 14/14] qapi: Use anonymous bases in QMP flat unions Eric Blake
2016-03-10 20:36 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 00/14] easier unboxed visits/qapi implicit types Markus Armbruster
2016-03-16 15:24   ` Markus Armbruster
2016-03-17 15:36     ` Eric Blake

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=56E19CBC.90605@redhat.com \
    --to=eblake@redhat.com \
    --cc=armbru@redhat.com \
    --cc=mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).