From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58014)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mreitz@redhat.com>) id 1aeOwU-00050m-Gr
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 11 Mar 2016 10:25:42 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mreitz@redhat.com>) id 1aeOwH-0005lV-0D
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 11 Mar 2016 10:25:30 -0500
References: <1457412306-18940-1-git-send-email-famz@redhat.com>
	<1457412306-18940-12-git-send-email-famz@redhat.com>
From: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <56E2E34F.4080602@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2016 16:25:03 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <1457412306-18940-12-git-send-email-famz@redhat.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature";
	boundary="gAhNXgJ2DWtpPsj013NN3Gd2iQ9sQRuVT"
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 11/15] block: Assert that
 bdrv_release_dirty_bitmap succeeded
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: kwolf@redhat.com, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>, jsnow@redhat.com, qemu-block@nongnu.org

This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156)
--gAhNXgJ2DWtpPsj013NN3Gd2iQ9sQRuVT
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="BNgMtDVumgwKnNln4MMSF7tdlRj5hrPV8"
From: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
To: Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: qemu-block@nongnu.org,
 Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>, jsnow@redhat.com,
 kwolf@redhat.com
Message-ID: <56E2E34F.4080602@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 11/15] block: Assert that bdrv_release_dirty_bitmap
 succeeded
References: <1457412306-18940-1-git-send-email-famz@redhat.com>
 <1457412306-18940-12-git-send-email-famz@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <1457412306-18940-12-git-send-email-famz@redhat.com>

--BNgMtDVumgwKnNln4MMSF7tdlRj5hrPV8
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 08.03.2016 05:45, Fam Zheng wrote:
> We use a loop over bs->dirty_bitmaps to make sure the caller is
> only releasing a bitmap owned by bs. Let's also assert that in this cas=
e
> the caller is releasing a bitmap that does exist.
>=20
> Signed-off-by: Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>
> ---
>  block/dirty-bitmap.c | 3 +++
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

Reviewed-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>


--BNgMtDVumgwKnNln4MMSF7tdlRj5hrPV8--

--gAhNXgJ2DWtpPsj013NN3Gd2iQ9sQRuVT
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJW4uNPAAoJEDuxQgLoOKytlgAIAJJQ7GgTBQdiUSX2Xv+xoH6c
O5cgdgQnbPKJp5nwUXq7jr+omqOAMzu3uTix8+KBP5yFxHjdmwsSne4a7IuH92ky
tK4MAHa1FMZ1dUmTliZoPFNvcC/N1OFb7GAfJ2fYh+44rVFIlliygr72ZtLIGEL+
uN/NGpNXenqA1JUMh5h8hM2IZfFfy1xs2rOCTJTzmTyPTX7cq29kDv2zcB1vycTP
ObcPm/ZJIU0Pw/OrqKR1e54ISjHvKF+DiDZJijp4+7lHMT6i18WXKMip6t56UhKz
tYzsFyczE3SmKCxYTRXoRBPUhxaUvlMdfTGm2EnZbGY+q8zBtLKwZtWaEUf47DI=
=Yjs/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--gAhNXgJ2DWtpPsj013NN3Gd2iQ9sQRuVT--