From: KONRAD Frederic <fred.konrad@greensocs.com>
To: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Peter Crosthwaite <crosthwaite.peter@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] [tcg] Idea on refactoring target code generation loop (gen_intermediate_code)
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2016 13:23:07 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56E6AD2B.7060304@greensocs.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56E046D3.2080709@twiddle.net>
Hi,
Le 09/03/2016 16:52, Richard Henderson a écrit :
> On 03/09/2016 09:38 AM, Lluís Vilanova wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> NOTE: I won't be throwing patches anytime soon, I just want to know
>> if there's
>> interest in this for the future.
>>
>> While adding events for tracing guest instructions, I've found that the
>> per-target "gen_intermediate_code()" function is very similar but not
>> exactly
>> the same for each of the targets. This makes architecture-agnostic
>> features
>> harder to maintain across targets, specially when it comes to their
>> relative
>> order.
>>
>> So, would it be worth it if I generalized part of that code into an
>> architecture-agnostic function that calls into target-specific hooks
>> wherever it
>> needs extending? There are many ways to do it that we can discuss later.
>
> It's worth talking about, since I do believe it would make long-term
> maintenance across the targets easier.
>
> These "target-specific hooks" probably ought not be "hooks" in the
> traditional sense of attaching them to CPUState. I'd be more
> comfortable with a refactoring that used include files -- maybe .h or
> maybe .inc.c. If we do the normal sort of hook, then we've got to
> either expose DisasContext in places we shouldn't, or dynamically
> allocate it. Neither seems particularly appealing.
>
>
> r~
>
On the other side I think attaching them to CPUState would make
heterogenous system emulation easier?
Fred
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-14 12:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-09 14:38 [Qemu-devel] [RFC] [tcg] Idea on refactoring target code generation loop (gen_intermediate_code) Lluís Vilanova
2016-03-09 15:52 ` Richard Henderson
2016-03-09 18:16 ` Lluís Vilanova
2016-03-09 18:54 ` Richard Henderson
2016-03-09 22:29 ` Lluís Vilanova
2016-03-09 23:27 ` Peter Maydell
2016-03-13 13:16 ` Lluís Vilanova
2016-03-13 16:25 ` Peter Maydell
2016-03-14 7:06 ` Markus Armbruster
2016-03-14 11:13 ` Lluís Vilanova
2016-04-03 13:05 ` Lluís Vilanova
2016-04-07 14:27 ` Markus Armbruster
2016-04-07 14:49 ` Peter Maydell
2016-04-07 15:01 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-04-08 13:15 ` Markus Armbruster
2016-04-08 14:14 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-04-11 5:50 ` Claudio Fontana
2016-04-11 13:11 ` Lluís Vilanova
2016-03-14 12:23 ` KONRAD Frederic [this message]
2016-03-14 14:14 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-03-14 14:26 ` Lluís Vilanova
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56E6AD2B.7060304@greensocs.com \
--to=fred.konrad@greensocs.com \
--cc=crosthwaite.peter@gmail.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=rth@twiddle.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).