From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/3] block: detach devices from DriveInfo at unrealize time
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2016 18:30:03 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56F02F9B.9040305@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8737rj7npp.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org>
On 21/03/2016 18:19, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> >
>> > The other possibility is to make blk_detach_dev do nothing if blk->dev
>> > == NULL, i.e. make it idempotent. On one hand, who doesn't like
>> > idempotency; on the other hand, removing an assertion is also dirty.
>> >
>> > I chose the easy way here (changing as fewer contracts as possible).
> Why can't we keep the work in the property release() method
> release_drive()?
>
> The only reason blockdev_mark_auto_del() isn't there is that the device
> decides whether to call it, not the property.
DEVICE_DELETED is currently sent right after setting unrealized to false
(see device_unparent), and you cannnot send it later than that. In
particular release_drive would mean sending the drive when properties
are removed in instance_finalize; by that time you don't have anymore a
QOM path to include in the event.
Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-21 17:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-22 14:39 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/3] Early release of -drive QemuOpts Paolo Bonzini
2016-02-22 14:39 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/3] block: detach devices from DriveInfo at unrealize time Paolo Bonzini
2016-03-21 15:13 ` Markus Armbruster
2016-03-21 15:31 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-03-21 17:19 ` Markus Armbruster
2016-03-21 17:30 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2016-03-23 8:35 ` Markus Armbruster
2016-03-23 9:35 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-03-22 22:15 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-02-22 14:39 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/3] block: keep BlockBackend alive until device finalize time Paolo Bonzini
2016-03-21 15:22 ` Markus Armbruster
2016-03-21 15:37 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-02-22 14:39 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/3] block: remove legacy_dinfo at blk_detach_dev time Paolo Bonzini
2016-03-21 16:15 ` Markus Armbruster
2016-03-21 16:21 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-03-21 17:30 ` Markus Armbruster
2016-03-21 17:34 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-03-21 18:14 ` Markus Armbruster
2016-03-22 8:19 ` Kevin Wolf
2016-03-22 10:25 ` Markus Armbruster
2016-03-22 22:07 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-03-23 9:18 ` Markus Armbruster
2016-03-23 9:40 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-03-23 12:13 ` Markus Armbruster
2016-03-21 17:39 ` Kevin Wolf
2016-03-21 18:02 ` Markus Armbruster
2016-03-22 22:10 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-03-23 8:37 ` Markus Armbruster
2016-03-09 12:20 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/3] Early release of -drive QemuOpts Paolo Bonzini
2016-03-09 12:30 ` Kevin Wolf
2016-03-09 12:53 ` Markus Armbruster
2016-03-17 17:00 ` Markus Armbruster
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56F02F9B.9040305@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).