From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35301) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aiTxC-0006Zq-Jn for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 22 Mar 2016 17:35:07 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aiTx7-0002ry-LT for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 22 Mar 2016 17:35:06 -0400 Sender: Paolo Bonzini References: <1458675397-24956-1-git-send-email-kwolf@redhat.com> From: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: <56F1BA83.5020203@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2016 22:34:59 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1458675397-24956-1-git-send-email-kwolf@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/9] block: Remove BlockDriverState.blk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Kevin Wolf , qemu-block@nongnu.org Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, mreitz@redhat.com On 22/03/2016 20:36, Kevin Wolf wrote: > This is the final patch series that is required before we can start allowing > setups with more than one BlockBackend per BlockDriverState. > > My current plan is to put the patches up to (and including) this series into > 2.6 so that we have a relatively consistent block layer state in the release > that isn't in the middle of an overhaul, but not to make use of the new setups > that we could allow now before 2.7. > > Depends on 'block: Move I/O throttling to BlockBackend'. I'm not sure how "posted one month after soft freeze", "depends on a series also posted one month after soft freeze" and "put the patches up to (and including) this series into 2.6" could go in the same message. Paolo