From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50760) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aijV0-0000Ic-7e for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 23 Mar 2016 10:11:06 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aijUw-0004ni-54 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 23 Mar 2016 10:11:02 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:38297) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aijUv-0004nb-VA for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 23 Mar 2016 10:10:58 -0400 References: <1458628457-1352-1-git-send-email-nutanshinde1992@gmail.com> <56F1C181.8040706@redhat.com> From: John Snow Message-ID: <56F2A3F0.7030006@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2016 10:10:56 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] hw/display contains files named *_template.h. These are included many times with different values of the DEPTH macro. However, only the DEPTH == 32 case is used. Removed support for DEPTH != 32 in the template headers and in the file that include them. List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Nutan Shinde Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On 03/23/2016 01:30 AM, Nutan Shinde wrote: > Hi John, > > My patch is same as the patch mentioned in the link. I just picked up > the task from BitSizedTask page, as it was not crossed. > > I guess the issue is resolved then, what should I do in this case? Also, > please tell me, how do I know which tasks are already taken up? > > Regards, > Nutan Shinde. > In some cases, since GSoC and Outreachy are approaching, a lot of people are trying to pick off the Bite Sizes Tasks right now. You may do well by checking https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2016-03/threads.html to make sure that nobody else has submitted a fix for the task you wish to fix. In some cases, fixes may have been submitted recently, but aren't accepted into QEMU just yet. Searching the list archives will help you determine which is which. Thanks, --js