qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
To: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>, Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: wei@redhat.com, peter.maydell@linaro.org, drjones@redhat.com,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org, mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
	abologna@redhat.com, qemu-arm@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 2/5] arm: qmp: add query-gic-capabilities interface
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2016 08:31:15 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <56F2A8B3.1000701@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87wpot47bo.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1310 bytes --]

On 03/23/2016 08:06 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:

>>> query-gic-capabilities looks like it fundamentally returns a list of
>>> capabilities.  Returning ['GICCapability'] is just fine then.
>>
>> I have posted v6 just as Eric has suggested. At least one advantage
>> is that it is easier to be extended (if needed) in the future, also
>> to follow the more-generic format to use dicts rather than
>> arrays. If you would not mind, I'll keep the dict interface there.
> 
> Returning such a list of a structured type is a well-established
> convention by now --- qmp-introspect.c shows 28 commands doing it, most
> of them named query-FOO.  I'd rather not start a different convention
> now, just because we got temporarily confused about our own rules.  So,
> unless there's something about query-gic-capabilities that makes it more
> likely to need extension outside its list element type, let's stick to
> returning the list.
> 
> Eric?

Makes sense to me, and perhaps my own fault for getting confused by not
even trying to delete just the whitelist line and seeing what would
happen.  Having a consistent style of query-* returning an array type is
reasonable to continue.

-- 
Eric Blake   eblake redhat com    +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 604 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2016-03-23 14:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-03-18  3:27 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 0/5] ARM: add query-gic-capabilities SMP command Peter Xu
2016-03-18  3:27 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 1/5] arm: qmp: add GICCapability struct Peter Xu
2016-03-22 18:29   ` Markus Armbruster
2016-03-22 18:41     ` Markus Armbruster
2016-03-23  2:58       ` Peter Xu
2016-03-23  9:33         ` Markus Armbruster
2016-03-23 11:48           ` Peter Xu
2016-03-23 12:21             ` Markus Armbruster
2016-03-23 14:25               ` Peter Xu
2016-03-23 15:17                 ` Markus Armbruster
2016-03-24  2:27                   ` Peter Xu
2016-03-22 18:32   ` Eric Blake
2016-03-23  3:09     ` Peter Xu
2016-03-23  9:44       ` Markus Armbruster
2016-03-23 11:56         ` Peter Xu
2016-03-18  3:27 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 2/5] arm: qmp: add query-gic-capabilities interface Peter Xu
2016-03-22 18:28   ` Markus Armbruster
2016-03-23  4:14     ` Peter Xu
2016-03-23  9:52       ` Markus Armbruster
2016-03-23 12:04         ` Peter Xu
2016-03-23 14:06           ` Markus Armbruster
2016-03-23 14:31             ` Eric Blake [this message]
2016-03-22 18:42   ` Eric Blake
2016-03-22 19:09     ` Markus Armbruster
2016-03-23  4:07     ` Peter Xu
2016-03-23  9:54       ` Markus Armbruster
2016-03-18  3:27 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 3/5] arm: enhance kvm_arm_create_scratch_host_vcpu Peter Xu
2016-03-18  3:27 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 4/5] kvm: add kvm_support_device() helper function Peter Xu
2016-03-18  3:27 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 5/5] arm: implement query-gic-capabilities Peter Xu
2016-03-21 15:56 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 0/5] ARM: add query-gic-capabilities SMP command Andrea Bolognani
2016-03-22  2:23   ` Peter Xu
2016-03-22 14:20 ` Markus Armbruster
2016-03-23  5:19   ` Peter Xu
2016-03-22 14:49 ` Peter Maydell
2016-03-23  5:43   ` Peter Xu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=56F2A8B3.1000701@redhat.com \
    --to=eblake@redhat.com \
    --cc=abologna@redhat.com \
    --cc=armbru@redhat.com \
    --cc=drjones@redhat.com \
    --cc=mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
    --cc=peterx@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-arm@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=wei@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).