From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59622) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aj3Oq-0006vy-71 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 24 Mar 2016 07:26:01 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aj3Ol-0001TD-JF for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 24 Mar 2016 07:26:00 -0400 References: <1458814461-5387-1-git-send-email-caoj.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> From: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: <56F3CEBE.7060002@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2016 12:25:50 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1458814461-5387-1-git-send-email-caoj.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] qdev property: cleanup List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Cao jin , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: qemu-trivial@nongnu.org, peter.maydell@linaro.org, armbru@redhat.com On 24/03/2016 11:14, Cao jin wrote: > include: > 1. remove unnecessary declaration of static function > 2. fix inconsistency between comment and function name, and typo OOM->QOM > 2. update comment of function > > Signed-off-by: Cao jin > --- > A question about legacy property: I don`t see legacy property is really > used in the code, so, why still add legacy property to object? It's used here: static void qdev_print_props(Monitor *mon, DeviceState *dev, Property *props, int indent) { if (!props) return; for (; props->name; props++) { Error *err = NULL; char *value; char *legacy_name = g_strdup_printf("legacy-%s", props->name); if (object_property_get_type(OBJECT(dev), legacy_name, NULL)) { value = object_property_get_str(OBJECT(dev), legacy_name, &err); } else { value = object_property_print(OBJECT(dev), props->name, true, &err); } g_free(legacy_name); if (err) { error_free(err); continue; } qdev_printf("%s = %s\n", props->name, value && *value ? value : ""); g_free(value); } } Paolo