From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53461) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ajTFL-0001DG-Oe for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 25 Mar 2016 11:01:56 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ajTFG-0002x5-ME for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 25 Mar 2016 11:01:55 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:36650) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ajTFG-0002wE-Gz for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 25 Mar 2016 11:01:50 -0400 References: From: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: <56F552DA.8000100@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2016 16:01:46 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] TCG question reg. tcg_cpu_exec() List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Pranith Kumar Cc: qemu-devel On 14/03/2016 16:26, Pranith Kumar wrote: > I am trying to understand what scenarios can result in no TBs > executing for that CPU. My understanding is that there is a pending > operation which needs to be handled before we can execute TBs from > this CPU(I/O?). For example the CPU could be halted and won't execute until it receives an interrupt. Paolo