From: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
To: "Denis V. Lunev" <den@openvz.org>,
nbd-general@lists.sourceforge.net, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Wouter Verhelst <w@uter.be>,
Pavel Borzenkov <pborzenkov@virtuozzo.com>,
Alex Bligh <alex@alex.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/3] NBD proto: add "Command flags" section
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 10:03:37 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56FAA759.70801@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56FAA6D9.8070800@redhat.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1492 bytes --]
On 03/29/2016 10:01 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 03/28/2016 04:43 AM, Denis V. Lunev wrote:
>> From: Pavel Borzenkov <pborzenkov@virtuozzo.com>
>>
>> Add separate "Command flags" section to make it clear which flags are
>> currently defined by the protocol.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Pavel Borzenkov <pborzenkov@virtuozzo.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Roman Kagan <rkagan@virtuozzo.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Denis V. Lunev <den@openvz.org>
>> CC: Wouter Verhelst <w@uter.be>
>> CC: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
>> CC: Alex Bligh <alex@alex.org.uk>
>> ---
>> doc/proto.md | 10 ++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/doc/proto.md b/doc/proto.md
>> index 036d6d9..662f741 100644
>> --- a/doc/proto.md
>> +++ b/doc/proto.md
>> @@ -485,6 +485,16 @@ The following request types exist:
>> Currently one such message is known: `NBD_CMD_CACHE`, with type set to
>> 5, implemented by xnbd.
>>
>> +#### Command flags
>> +
>
> I think that this new content would belong better as a subsection under
> '#### Flag Fields', alongside the mention of all other flags. I'm going
> to propose a v2 of this patch with that alternate position, for comparison.
Hmm, maybe not. I just looked again, and '#### Flag fields' is a
subsection of '### Handshake phase', while you are correct that command
flags belong to '### Transmission phase'.
--
Eric Blake eblake redhat com +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 604 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-29 16:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-28 10:43 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/3] Fix some ambiguities in the NBD protocol Denis V. Lunev
2016-03-28 10:43 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/3] NBD proto: forbid TRIM command without negotiation Denis V. Lunev
2016-03-28 13:00 ` Eric Blake
2016-03-29 7:22 ` [Qemu-devel] [Nbd] " Wouter Verhelst
2016-03-29 13:54 ` Eric Blake
2016-03-28 10:43 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/3] NBD proto: document additional error conditions Denis V. Lunev
2016-03-28 13:05 ` Eric Blake
2016-03-28 10:43 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/3] NBD proto: add "Command flags" section Denis V. Lunev
2016-03-28 13:45 ` Eric Blake
2016-03-29 7:34 ` [Qemu-devel] [Nbd] " Wouter Verhelst
2016-03-29 16:01 ` [Qemu-devel] " Eric Blake
2016-03-29 16:03 ` Eric Blake [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56FAA759.70801@redhat.com \
--to=eblake@redhat.com \
--cc=alex@alex.org.uk \
--cc=den@openvz.org \
--cc=nbd-general@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=pborzenkov@virtuozzo.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=w@uter.be \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).