From: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
To: Wouter Verhelst <w@uter.be>
Cc: "nbd-general@lists.sourceforge.net"
<nbd-general@lists.sourceforge.net>,
"qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Nbd] [PATCH 3/1] doc: Propose Structured Replies extension
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 12:25:35 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56FAC89F.7080706@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160329181949.GB12469@grep.be>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1846 bytes --]
On 03/29/2016 12:19 PM, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 12:07:59PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
>> On 03/29/2016 12:03 PM, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
>>> On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 11:45:45AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
>>>> Supporting DF merely transfers the burden of collection between server
>>>> and client. I suspect that there are cases where the server does NOT
>>>> want to support DF (because it would require the server to allocate
>>>> memory to collect the data before sending a single structured read
>>>> reply),
>>>
>>> There are other ways to handle that; e.g., the server could have a
>>> "request too large for non-fragmented read" error message. The spec
>>> should give a minimum size that the server MUST support (which should be
>>> reasonably large), and should state that a server MAY reply to any
>>> request with DF set for a block larger than that minimum, with that
>>> error.
>>
>> How does 64k sound?
>
> Dunno. It might make sense for this number to be based upon some
> "standard" minimum request size in things like ATA or SCSI if such a
> number exists there, but I don't know enough about either standard to
> answer that question myself.
>
> If such a number doesn't exist (or nobody who knows speaks up soon
> enough), 64k is certainly good enough, I suppose.
And as mentioned in another email, we may want to propose an independent
extension that allows NBD_OPT_LIST and friends to start advertising the
minimum and preferred sizes of operations on a given export, where the
server can give hard errors if the client requests a read or write not
aligned to the minimum, and where the server must not fail a DF set for
anything smaller than preferred size.
--
Eric Blake eblake redhat com +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 604 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-29 18:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-28 13:59 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] doc: Mention proper use of handle Eric Blake
2016-03-29 3:56 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/1] doc: More details on flag negotiation Eric Blake
2016-03-29 3:56 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/1] doc: Propose Structured Replies extension Eric Blake
2016-03-29 7:33 ` [Qemu-devel] [Nbd] " Wouter Verhelst
2016-03-29 8:24 ` Alex Bligh
2016-03-29 14:21 ` Eric Blake
2016-03-29 14:37 ` Alex Bligh
2016-03-29 15:12 ` Eric Blake
2016-03-29 16:37 ` Wouter Verhelst
2016-03-29 17:34 ` Alex Bligh
2016-03-29 17:45 ` Eric Blake
2016-03-29 18:03 ` Wouter Verhelst
2016-03-29 18:07 ` Eric Blake
2016-03-29 18:19 ` Wouter Verhelst
2016-03-29 18:25 ` Eric Blake [this message]
2016-03-29 18:09 ` Alex Bligh
2016-03-29 17:53 ` Wouter Verhelst
2016-03-29 18:23 ` Eric Blake
2016-03-29 18:51 ` Wouter Verhelst
2016-03-29 19:06 ` Wouter Verhelst
2016-03-29 19:39 ` Alex Bligh
2016-03-29 20:00 ` Eric Blake
2016-03-29 20:18 ` Alex Bligh
2016-03-29 20:44 ` Alex Bligh
2016-03-29 21:05 ` Wouter Verhelst
2016-03-29 22:05 ` Alex Bligh
2016-03-29 22:45 ` Wouter Verhelst
2016-03-29 22:53 ` Alex Bligh
2016-03-29 7:11 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] doc: Mention proper use of handle Wouter Verhelst
2016-03-29 13:59 ` Eric Blake
2016-03-29 23:00 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/3] NBD Structured Read Eric Blake
2016-03-29 23:00 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 1/3] NBD proto: add "Command flags" section Eric Blake
2016-03-29 23:00 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 2/3] doc: Mention proper use of handle Eric Blake
2016-03-29 23:01 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 3/3] doc: Propose Structured Read extension Eric Blake
2016-03-29 23:29 ` Eric Blake
2016-03-30 6:50 ` Alex Bligh
2016-03-30 17:45 ` Eric Blake
2016-03-30 19:51 ` [Qemu-devel] [Nbd] " Wouter Verhelst
2016-03-30 20:54 ` Eric Blake
2016-03-30 21:26 ` Wouter Verhelst
2016-03-30 22:48 ` [Qemu-devel] " Alex Bligh
2016-03-30 20:44 ` [Qemu-devel] [Nbd] " Wouter Verhelst
2016-03-30 8:09 ` [Qemu-devel] [Nbd] [PATCH v2 0/3] NBD Structured Read Wouter Verhelst
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56FAC89F.7080706@redhat.com \
--to=eblake@redhat.com \
--cc=nbd-general@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=w@uter.be \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).