qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: ehabkost@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] target-i386: assert that KVM_GET/SET_MSRS can set all requested MSRs
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2016 15:01:29 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <56FD1FA9.7070200@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1459371583-4824-2-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com>

On 03/30/16 22:59, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> This would have caught the bug in the previous patch.

Should this patch share a series with
<http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.qemu/404245>? Otherwise
they could be separated by other patches in the commit history, and then
"previous patch" would be misleading.

(Alternatively, the reference to "previous patch" could be made by subject.)

> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
> ---
>  target-i386/kvm.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>  1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/target-i386/kvm.c b/target-i386/kvm.c
> index 19e2d94..799fdfa 100644
> --- a/target-i386/kvm.c
> +++ b/target-i386/kvm.c
> @@ -141,6 +141,7 @@ static int kvm_get_tsc(CPUState *cs)
>          return ret;
>      }
>  
> +    assert(ret == 1);
>      env->tsc = msr_data.entries[0].data;
>      return 0;
>  }
> @@ -1446,6 +1447,7 @@ static int kvm_put_tscdeadline_msr(X86CPU *cpu)
>          struct kvm_msr_entry entries[1];
>      } msr_data;
>      struct kvm_msr_entry *msrs = msr_data.entries;
> +    int ret;
>  
>      if (!has_msr_tsc_deadline) {
>          return 0;
> @@ -1457,7 +1459,13 @@ static int kvm_put_tscdeadline_msr(X86CPU *cpu)
>          .nmsrs = 1,
>      };
>  
> -    return kvm_vcpu_ioctl(CPU(cpu), KVM_SET_MSRS, &msr_data);
> +    ret = kvm_vcpu_ioctl(CPU(cpu), KVM_SET_MSRS, &msr_data);
> +    if (ret < 0) {
> +        return ret;
> +    }
> +
> +    assert(ret == 1);
> +    return 0;
>  }

This changes the return value of kvm_put_tscdeadline_msr() -- and
friends below -- for successful invocations. I guess that's fine, but a
note about it in the commit message would be nice.

Anyway, I'm not an "expert" in this area, so the best I can offer for
this two-part (almost-) series, with the commit message nits fixed, is

Acked-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>

Thanks
Laszlo

>  
>  /*
> @@ -1472,6 +1480,11 @@ static int kvm_put_msr_feature_control(X86CPU *cpu)
>          struct kvm_msrs info;
>          struct kvm_msr_entry entry;
>      } msr_data;
> +    int ret;
> +
> +    if (!has_msr_feature_control) {
> +        return 0;
> +    }
>  
>      kvm_msr_entry_set(&msr_data.entry, MSR_IA32_FEATURE_CONTROL,
>                        cpu->env.msr_ia32_feature_control);
> @@ -1480,7 +1493,13 @@ static int kvm_put_msr_feature_control(X86CPU *cpu)
>          .nmsrs = 1,
>      };
>  
> -    return kvm_vcpu_ioctl(CPU(cpu), KVM_SET_MSRS, &msr_data);
> +    ret = kvm_vcpu_ioctl(CPU(cpu), KVM_SET_MSRS, &msr_data);
> +    if (ret < 0) {
> +        return ret;
> +    }
> +
> +    assert(ret == 1);
> +    return 0;
>  }
>  
>  static int kvm_put_msrs(X86CPU *cpu, int level)
> @@ -1492,6 +1511,7 @@ static int kvm_put_msrs(X86CPU *cpu, int level)
>      } msr_data;
>      struct kvm_msr_entry *msrs = msr_data.entries;
>      int n = 0, i;
> +    int ret;
>  
>      kvm_msr_entry_set(&msrs[n++], MSR_IA32_SYSENTER_CS, env->sysenter_cs);
>      kvm_msr_entry_set(&msrs[n++], MSR_IA32_SYSENTER_ESP, env->sysenter_esp);
> @@ -1685,8 +1705,13 @@ static int kvm_put_msrs(X86CPU *cpu, int level)
>          .nmsrs = n,
>      };
>  
> -    return kvm_vcpu_ioctl(CPU(cpu), KVM_SET_MSRS, &msr_data);
> +    ret = kvm_vcpu_ioctl(CPU(cpu), KVM_SET_MSRS, &msr_data);
> +    if (ret < 0) {
> +        return ret;
> +    }
>  
> +    assert(ret == n);
> +    return 0;
>  }
>  
>  
> @@ -2055,6 +2080,7 @@ static int kvm_get_msrs(X86CPU *cpu)
>          return ret;
>      }
>  
> +    assert(ret == n);
>      for (i = 0; i < ret; i++) {
>          uint32_t index = msrs[i].index;
>          switch (index) {
> @@ -2511,7 +2537,7 @@ int kvm_arch_put_registers(CPUState *cpu, int level)
>  
>      assert(cpu_is_stopped(cpu) || qemu_cpu_is_self(cpu));
>  
> -    if (level >= KVM_PUT_RESET_STATE && has_msr_feature_control) {
> +    if (level >= KVM_PUT_RESET_STATE) {
>          ret = kvm_put_msr_feature_control(x86_cpu);
>          if (ret < 0) {
>              return ret;
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2016-03-31 13:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-03-30 20:59 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] target-i386: assert that KVM_GET/SET_MSRS can set all requested MSRs Paolo Bonzini
2016-03-31 13:01 ` Laszlo Ersek [this message]
2016-03-31 13:03   ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-03-31 16:51   ` Eduardo Habkost

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=56FD1FA9.7070200@redhat.com \
    --to=lersek@redhat.com \
    --cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).