From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46975) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1alu0e-0004SX-Ik for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 01 Apr 2016 04:00:49 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1alu0a-0007cO-Qk for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 01 Apr 2016 04:00:48 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:53571) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1alu0a-0007c7-Ls for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 01 Apr 2016 04:00:44 -0400 References: <1459435721-21351-1-git-send-email-thuth@redhat.com> <20160331220043.GN2749@var.home> <20160331222221.GO2749@var.home> From: Thomas Huth Message-ID: <56FE2AA8.6070801@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2016 10:00:40 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160331222221.GO2749@var.home> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] slirp: Fix migration from older versions of QEMU to the current one List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Samuel Thibault Cc: Jan Kiszka , qemu-devel@nongnu.org On 01.04.2016 00:22, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Samuel Thibault, on Fri 01 Apr 2016 00:00:43 +0200, wrote: >> Just realizing... We'd need to add AF_INET6 cases here too, to be able >> to save/restore a VM using ipv6 connections. > > That seems quite involved however, maybe we should postpone that to > later? I think it's ok to do it later. The code there is only invoked when the user specified the "guestfwd=..." option, so that's likely rather a rare case, I think, which could be postponed to QEMU 2.7. Thomas