From: "Martin Guy" <martinwguy@gmail.com>
To: sol10x86@cox.net, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] A question about QEMU performance
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 09:27:07 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56d259a00609270127x1d825a5eo481057d8123cf16d@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <29036817.1159299723859.JavaMail.root@eastrmwml06.mgt.cox.net>
> > If I run qemu for i386 without kqemu it uses soft-mmu, so it operates as
> > another architetture as ppc or mips right?
> > So... are the performace of qemu the same if I use i386 or mips or something
> > change deeply?
> > Example: if I run the same program on i386 emulation without kqemu or on
> > mips are the performance circa the same?
>
> Would you expect qemu to perform the same on an AMD 4600X2 as
> a 400 Mhz MIPS?
There are some statistics at freaknet.org/martin/QEMU for various
types of x86 processor, but giving only BogoMIPS, which are way
overrated.
I presume this is cos QEMU translates the kernel speed test loop once
then runs it as x86 code, while "real" tasks need to be translated all
the time.
The only concrete figures I have are from when I timed the running of
bash's configure script, which causes a lot of program execution as
well as compiling and running lots of short test programs. The results
are in cluster.aleph1.co.uk/~martin/qemu.html (please ignore the other
garbage on that page!)
M
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-09-27 8:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-09-26 19:42 [Qemu-devel] A question about QEMU performance Ben Taylor
2006-09-27 8:27 ` Martin Guy [this message]
2006-09-27 8:28 ` Martin Guy
2006-10-25 18:51 ` Rob Landley
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-09-26 18:57 Alessandro Corradi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56d259a00609270127x1d825a5eo481057d8123cf16d@mail.gmail.com \
--to=martinwguy@gmail.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=sol10x86@cox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).