From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GSUmD-0008D3-P1 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 04:28:21 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GSUmC-0008Bk-8n for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 04:28:21 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GSUmC-0008Bg-1X for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 04:28:20 -0400 Received: from [199.232.41.67] (helo=mx20.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.52) id 1GSUr0-0004YM-UC for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 04:33:19 -0400 Received: from [64.233.166.181] (helo=py-out-1112.google.com) by mx20.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GSUmB-0004OL-DW for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 04:28:19 -0400 Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id x31so172186pye for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 01:28:19 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <56d259a00609270128p784f0d93heee42213affe1a34@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 09:28:18 +0100 From: "Martin Guy" Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] A question about QEMU performance In-Reply-To: <56d259a00609270127x1d825a5eo481057d8123cf16d@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <29036817.1159299723859.JavaMail.root@eastrmwml06.mgt.cox.net> <56d259a00609270127x1d825a5eo481057d8123cf16d@mail.gmail.com> Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: sol10x86@cox.net, qemu-devel@nongnu.org > There are some statistics at freaknet.org/martin/QEMU for various > are in cluster.aleph1.co.uk/~martin/qemu.html (please ignore the other Sorry, that first page is bogus. I meant the second. M