From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GbhSY-0008De-GB for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 22 Oct 2006 13:50:06 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GbhSV-0008D2-2A for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 22 Oct 2006 13:50:05 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GbhSU-0008Cy-VI for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 22 Oct 2006 13:50:03 -0400 Received: from [199.232.41.67] (helo=mx20.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.52) id 1GbhSV-0002ZE-07 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 22 Oct 2006 13:50:03 -0400 Received: from [64.233.166.179] (helo=py-out-1112.google.com) by mx20.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GbhST-000793-Ls for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 22 Oct 2006 13:50:01 -0400 Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id c63so242061pyc for ; Sun, 22 Oct 2006 10:49:01 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <56d259a00610221019pcc7ba3bv4510d1a7b447b0f9@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2006 18:19:14 +0100 From: "Martin Guy" Sender: martinwguy@gmail.com Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Config file support In-Reply-To: <453BA3D2.1080006@zipman.it> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <8a6cde920610210300ib8a0dfdi65c4baf6f7ae7ca5@mail.gmail.com> <453BA3D2.1080006@zipman.it> Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org > VMWare's config file style is really simple ethernet0.present = "TRUE" ethernet0.virtualDev = "e1000" e1000bios.filename = "path/etherboot-for-E1000" > and it would be possible to > use VMWare's files with few or no changes. Would that be enough to be able to move the emulated system description into config files rather than having the set of hard-coded machine alternatives we have at present? If so it would be a boon to anyone wanting to emulate, frinstance, any ARM board other than those manufactured by ARM Corp.