From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33495)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <pbonzini@redhat.com>) id 1an2lR-0002H7-8m
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 04 Apr 2016 07:33:49 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <pbonzini@redhat.com>) id 1an2lN-0006TC-8x
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 04 Apr 2016 07:33:49 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:58207)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <pbonzini@redhat.com>) id 1an2lN-0006T8-3l
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 04 Apr 2016 07:33:45 -0400
References: <87y48tu53d.fsf@linaro.org> <57022D7A.1040507@redhat.com>
	<57024478.2080506@gmail.com> <87wpodty5d.fsf@linaro.org>
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <57025113.7000101@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2016 13:33:39 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <87wpodty5d.fsf@linaro.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Should we introduce a TranslationRegion with its
 own codegen buffer?
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: =?UTF-8?Q?Alex_Benn=c3=a9e?= <alex.bennee@linaro.org>, Sergey Fedorov <serge.fdrv@gmail.com>
Cc: MTTCG Devel <mttcg@greensocs.com>, Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>, Cota@braap.org, QEMU Developers <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>, Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>



On 04/04/2016 13:24, Alex Benn=C3=A9e wrote:
> FWIW I've dropped the patch that moves tb_find_fast out of tb_lock in
> the upcoming base-patches-v2 series because it:
>   - weirdly breaks the pxe tests

I'm happy to take a look.

>   - is pretty ugly anyway

What exactly makes it ugly?

Paolo

> This is obviously going to have an impact on performance which bought m=
e
> back to should we be thinking more holistically about how to approach
> this problem.