From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49754)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <pbonzini@redhat.com>) id 1an4B9-0003iy-Sg
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 04 Apr 2016 09:04:33 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <pbonzini@redhat.com>) id 1an4B4-0008EL-Bd
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 04 Apr 2016 09:04:27 -0400
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <57026647.70008@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2016 15:04:07 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [Qemu-devel] sheepdog's "CoQueue overlapping_queue;"
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>, qemu block <qemu-block@nongnu.org>, Hitoshi Mitake <mitake.hitoshi@lab.ntt.co.jp>

I am curious about why overlapping_queue is required for sheepdog.
Overlapping requests have unspecified outcome so the CoQueue is not
necessary as long as the server doesn't crash or return an error.

Hitoshi, could you clarify this point for me?

Thanks,

Paolo