From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45143) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1an5jm-0001VP-Md for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 04 Apr 2016 10:44:19 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1an5jj-0005w8-F9 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 04 Apr 2016 10:44:18 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:59249) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1an5jj-0005vz-A3 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 04 Apr 2016 10:44:15 -0400 References: <1459780549-12942-1-git-send-email-alex.bennee@linaro.org> From: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: <57027DB9.8060806@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2016 16:44:09 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1459780549-12942-1-git-send-email-alex.bennee@linaro.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/2] Fix for compile on FreeBSD/i386 (and others?) List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: =?UTF-8?Q?Alex_Benn=c3=a9e?= , peter.maydell@linaro.org Cc: sbruno@freebsd.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org On 04/04/2016 16:35, Alex Benn=C3=A9e wrote: > Only the first patch has actually changed. Instead of moving the read > inside the write seqlock it is now done using the seqlock_read_* > primitives. >=20 > Build tested on a FreeBSB/i386 VM with these applied: >=20 > https://github.com/berrange/qemu/tree/freebsd-fixes >=20 > There are still a ton of unrelated warnings being kicked out of the com= piler > though. On the VM "make check" fails at ... but as the build was > broken beforehand I can't tell if this is a regression. It passes fine > on my Linux box. >=20 > Alex Benn=C3=A9e (2): > cpus: don't use atomic_read for vm_clock_warp_start > include/qemu/atomic: add compile time asserts >=20 > cpus.c | 10 ++++++++- > include/qemu/atomic.h | 58 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------= -------- > 2 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-) >=20 Queued for 2.6, thanks. I will send a pull request later this week. Paolo