From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33542) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1anpMQ-0001A5-Ep for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 06 Apr 2016 11:27:15 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1anpMP-0005eD-JK for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 06 Apr 2016 11:27:14 -0400 Sender: Paolo Bonzini References: <20160406090802.GC16003@stefanha-x1.localdomain> From: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: <57052AC8.5060609@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2016 17:27:04 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Possible bug: virtio-scsi + iothread (Former x-data-plane) = "Guest moved index from 0 to 61440" warning List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Zir Blazer , Stefan Hajnoczi Cc: "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" , "qemu-block@nongnu.org" On 06/04/2016 16:59, Zir Blazer wrote: >> On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 07:49:47PM -0300, Zir Blazer wrote: >> > The bare minimum script that produces the warning, should be this: >> > #!/bin/bash >> > qemu-system-x86_64 \-m 1024M \-enable-kvm \-object > iothread,id=iothread0 \-device virtio-scsi-pci,iothread=iothread0 \ >> > This produces the "Guest moved index from 0 to 61440" warning. >> >> It does not produce a warning with qemu.git/master. I see the BIOS >> screen. >> >> Stefan > > Sad that you didn't manage to reproduce it. Maybe its fixed on latest > QEMU, but to test that I would have to learn how to compile and install > it myself (Or wait for the Arch Linux User Repository qemu-git to catch > up, otherwise I will have to wait for 2.6). > > I would like if someone could confirm if it happens on QEMU 2.5, or I'm > the only one affected due to some other misconfiguration issue (Which > would be rather rare, since what I'm using is a pretty much a fresh > install, an Arch Linux has a mostly vanilla QEMU). I can confirm that it shows the message in Fedora's QEMU 2.5 but not with upstream 2.6. Thanks, Paolo