From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35851) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ansBa-0005ow-Jh for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 06 Apr 2016 14:28:15 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ansBZ-0006m0-H3 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 06 Apr 2016 14:28:14 -0400 References: <1458837566-108527-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> <20160330130616.GC6764@stefanha-x1.localdomain> <56FBD1D6.4060303@redhat.com> <20160406181940.GM5098@noname.redhat.com> From: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: <57055534.2060903@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2016 20:28:04 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160406181940.GM5098@noname.redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 0/7] bdrv_flush_io_queue removal, shared LinuxAioState List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Kevin Wolf Cc: qemu-block@nongnu.org, famz@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Stefan Hajnoczi On 06/04/2016 20:19, Kevin Wolf wrote: >> > >> > Great, I'll send v4 as soon as possible for inclusion in the block-next >> > branch. > Are you still working on v4 or did I miss it? All of the block-next > candidate series are waiting to be rebased on this one, and moving parts > at the bottom of a longish dependency chain are kind of nasty. Yes, I am waiting for Fam's bdrv_co_drain patch, which is this one depends on. Paolo