From: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
To: Alex Bligh <alex@alex.org.uk>
Cc: "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.6] nbd: Don't fail handshake on NBD_OPT_LIST descriptions
Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2016 07:52:15 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5707B78F.5050104@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <D759FB98-6D97-4DBE-B514-3EDE80E55D12@alex.org.uk>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1697 bytes --]
On 04/07/2016 11:51 PM, Alex Bligh wrote:
>
> On 8 Apr 2016, at 02:09, Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> The NBD Protocol states that NBD_REP_SERVER may set
>> 'length > sizeof(namelen) + namelen'; in which case the rest
>> of the packet is a UTF-8 description of the export. While we
>> don't know of any NBD servers that send this description yet,
>> we had better consume the data so we don't choke when we start
>> to talk to such a server.
>>
>> Also, a (buggy/malicious) server that replies with length <
>> sizeof(namelen) would cause us to block waiting for bytes that
>> the server is not sending, and one that replies with super-huge
>> lengths could cause us to temporarily allocate up to 4G memory.
>> Sanity check things before blindly reading incorrectly.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
>> ---
>> + if (len < namelen) {
>> + error_setg(errp, "incorrect option name length");
>> return -1;
>> }
>> if (namelen > 255) {
>
> Shouldn't that be 4096? You are after all reading up to NBD_MAX_BUFFER_SIZE (32K) of data just earlier.
>
NBD_MAX_BUFFER_SIZE is actually 32M, not 32k.
> Not technically the bug you are trying to fix, so
And yes, I need to do a much bigger scrub of qemu code, both client and
server, to allow export names longer than 255, up to the
just-barely-documented 4096 maximum in the NBD protocol. But you are
right that such an audit is separate from this immediate fix.
>
> Reviewed-by: Alex Bligh <alex@alex.org.uk>
Thanks.
--
Eric Blake eblake redhat com +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 604 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-08 13:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-08 1:09 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.6] nbd: Don't fail handshake on NBD_OPT_LIST descriptions Eric Blake
2016-04-08 5:51 ` Alex Bligh
2016-04-08 13:52 ` Eric Blake [this message]
2016-04-14 15:26 ` Eric Blake
2016-04-14 15:46 ` Alex Bligh
2016-04-14 21:31 ` Max Reitz
2016-04-14 22:07 ` Eric Blake
2016-04-14 22:21 ` Max Reitz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5707B78F.5050104@redhat.com \
--to=eblake@redhat.com \
--cc=alex@alex.org.uk \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).