From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47582) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aqmPu-0002gj-Ln for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 14 Apr 2016 14:55:03 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aqmPr-0006JJ-G2 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 14 Apr 2016 14:55:02 -0400 Received: from mifritscher.de ([188.40.170.105]:52553 helo=mail.mifritscher.vserverkompetenz.de) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aqmPr-0006Ik-Ae for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 14 Apr 2016 14:54:59 -0400 References: <1460655977-436-1-git-send-email-sw@weilnetz.de> <20160414180804.GE3189@var.upmc.fr> From: Michael Fritscher Message-ID: <570FE780.2090600@fritscher.net> Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2016 20:54:56 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160414180804.GE3189@var.upmc.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for 2.6] wxx: Fix broken TCP networking (regression) List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Samuel Thibault , Stefan Weil Cc: QEMU Developer , "Daniel P. Berrange" , Paolo Bonzini , Jan Kiszka , Peter Maydell Hello Samuel, > Michael, what do you mean by "slow", the bandwidth, or the time to > connect? Does it help if you disable ipv6? @Ipv6: I'll test it tomorrow. I tested with wget http://www.heise.de. On the guest program point of view, it seems to hang at waiting at the first patch of data after sending the request. (see the screenshot I sent you directly). After starting receiving, it seems as the data were here instantly (a bit slowed down by the strace, but this was very much faster than the wait for the beginning of the response). Another thing: The tcpdump which was running within qemu dropped 30 out of 83 packets... It was running on a Skylake based Xeon CPU with almost 3 GHz - so I think this shouldn't be a problem^^ I sent you the tcpdumps directly as well. I tested it on Windows 7 64 bit. Best regards, Michael