From: "Denis V. Lunev" <den@openvz.org>
To: Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>, Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>,
Jeff Cody <jcody@redhat.com>,
Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>,
Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>, John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>,
qemu-block@nongnu.org, berrange@redhat.com, pbonzini@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.7 v2 04/17] block: Introduce image file locking
Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2016 16:22:59 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <57123CB3.9070803@openvz.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1460690887-32751-5-git-send-email-famz@redhat.com>
On 04/15/2016 06:27 AM, Fam Zheng wrote:
> Block drivers can implement this new operation .bdrv_lockf to actually lock the
> image in the protocol specific way.
>
> Signed-off-by: Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>
> ---
> block.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/block/block_int.h | 12 ++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 54 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/block.c b/block.c
> index 1c575e4..7971a25 100644
> --- a/block.c
> +++ b/block.c
> @@ -846,6 +846,34 @@ out:
> g_free(gen_node_name);
> }
>
> +static int bdrv_lock_unlock_image_do(BlockDriverState *bs, bool lock_image)
> +{
> + int cmd = BDRV_LOCKF_UNLOCK;
> +
> + if (bs->image_locked == lock_image) {
> + return 0;
> + } else if (!bs->drv) {
> + return -ENOMEDIUM;
> + } else if (!bs->drv->bdrv_lockf) {
> + return 0;
> + }
> + if (lock_image) {
> + cmd = bs->open_flags & BDRV_O_RDWR ? BDRV_LOCKF_RWLOCK :
> + BDRV_LOCKF_ROLOCK;
> + }
> + return bs->drv->bdrv_lockf(bs, cmd);
should we handle ENOTSUP specially?
f.e. this would fire with raw-posix.c on a filesystem which does not
support locking.
from my POW this situations is equivalent to the absence of
bs->drv->bdrv_lockf
> +}
> +
> +static int bdrv_lock_image(BlockDriverState *bs)
> +{
> + return bdrv_lock_unlock_image_do(bs, true);
> +}
> +
> +static int bdrv_unlock_image(BlockDriverState *bs)
> +{
> + return bdrv_lock_unlock_image_do(bs, false);
> +}
> +
> static QemuOptsList bdrv_runtime_opts = {
> .name = "bdrv_common",
> .head = QTAILQ_HEAD_INITIALIZER(bdrv_runtime_opts.head),
> @@ -995,6 +1023,14 @@ static int bdrv_open_common(BlockDriverState *bs, BdrvChild *file,
> goto free_and_fail;
> }
>
> + if (!(open_flags & (BDRV_O_NO_LOCK | BDRV_O_INACTIVE))) {
> + ret = bdrv_lock_image(bs);
> + if (ret) {
> + error_setg(errp, "Failed to lock image");
> + goto free_and_fail;
> + }
> + }
> +
> ret = refresh_total_sectors(bs, bs->total_sectors);
> if (ret < 0) {
> error_setg_errno(errp, -ret, "Could not refresh total sector count");
> @@ -2144,6 +2180,7 @@ static void bdrv_close(BlockDriverState *bs)
> if (bs->drv) {
> BdrvChild *child, *next;
>
> + bdrv_unlock_image(bs);
> bs->drv->bdrv_close(bs);
> bs->drv = NULL;
>
> @@ -3230,6 +3267,9 @@ void bdrv_invalidate_cache(BlockDriverState *bs, Error **errp)
> error_setg_errno(errp, -ret, "Could not refresh total sector count");
> return;
> }
> + if (!(bs->open_flags & BDRV_O_NO_LOCK)) {
> + bdrv_lock_image(bs);
> + }
> }
>
> void bdrv_invalidate_cache_all(Error **errp)
> @@ -3262,6 +3302,7 @@ static int bdrv_inactivate(BlockDriverState *bs)
> }
>
> bs->open_flags |= BDRV_O_INACTIVE;
> + ret = bdrv_unlock_image(bs);
I'd better move unlock a line above.
Though this is personal. This could be useful
for debugging purposes.
> return 0;
> }
>
> @@ -3981,3 +4022,4 @@ void bdrv_refresh_filename(BlockDriverState *bs)
> QDECREF(json);
> }
> }
> +
this hunk is extra
> diff --git a/include/block/block_int.h b/include/block/block_int.h
> index 10d8759..ffa30b0 100644
> --- a/include/block/block_int.h
> +++ b/include/block/block_int.h
> @@ -85,6 +85,12 @@ typedef struct BdrvTrackedRequest {
> struct BdrvTrackedRequest *waiting_for;
> } BdrvTrackedRequest;
>
> +typedef enum {
> + BDRV_LOCKF_RWLOCK,
> + BDRV_LOCKF_ROLOCK,
> + BDRV_LOCKF_UNLOCK,
> +} BdrvLockfCmd;
> +
> struct BlockDriver {
> const char *format_name;
> int instance_size;
> @@ -317,6 +323,11 @@ struct BlockDriver {
> */
> void (*bdrv_drain)(BlockDriverState *bs);
>
> + /**
> + * Lock/unlock the image.
> + */
> + int (*bdrv_lockf)(BlockDriverState *bs, BdrvLockfCmd cmd);
> +
> QLIST_ENTRY(BlockDriver) list;
> };
>
> @@ -485,6 +496,7 @@ struct BlockDriverState {
> NotifierWithReturn write_threshold_notifier;
>
> int quiesce_counter;
> + bool image_locked;
> };
>
> struct BlockBackendRootState {
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-16 13:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 65+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-15 3:27 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.7 v2 00/17] block: Lock images when opening Fam Zheng
2016-04-15 3:27 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.7 v2 01/17] block: Add BDRV_O_NO_LOCK Fam Zheng
2016-04-16 10:47 ` Denis V. Lunev
2016-04-15 3:27 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.7 v2 02/17] qapi: Add lock-image in blockdev-add options Fam Zheng
2016-04-16 10:48 ` Denis V. Lunev
2016-04-26 8:01 ` Fam Zheng
2016-04-15 3:27 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.7 v2 03/17] blockdev: Add and parse "lock-image" option for block devices Fam Zheng
2016-04-16 13:15 ` Denis V. Lunev
2016-04-19 13:00 ` Fam Zheng
2016-04-15 3:27 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.7 v2 04/17] block: Introduce image file locking Fam Zheng
2016-04-16 13:22 ` Denis V. Lunev [this message]
2016-04-18 1:43 ` Fam Zheng
2016-04-16 23:29 ` Max Reitz
2016-04-18 1:33 ` Fam Zheng
2016-04-18 5:34 ` Denis V. Lunev
2016-04-19 19:14 ` Max Reitz
2016-04-20 8:46 ` Denis V. Lunev
2016-04-19 19:13 ` Max Reitz
2016-04-25 23:55 ` Laszlo Ersek
2016-04-26 0:47 ` Fam Zheng
2016-04-15 3:27 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.7 v2 05/17] raw-posix: Implement .bdrv_lockf Fam Zheng
2016-04-16 13:29 ` Denis V. Lunev
2016-04-18 1:12 ` Fam Zheng
2016-04-18 5:30 ` Denis V. Lunev
2016-04-18 9:34 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2016-04-18 9:38 ` Denis V. Lunev
2016-04-17 19:27 ` Richard W.M. Jones
2016-04-18 1:10 ` Fam Zheng
2016-04-18 8:04 ` Richard W.M. Jones
2016-04-19 12:37 ` Fam Zheng
2016-04-19 13:07 ` Richard W.M. Jones
2016-04-19 13:19 ` Fam Zheng
2016-04-19 13:36 ` Richard W.M. Jones
2016-04-19 13:45 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2016-04-19 13:34 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2016-04-19 13:40 ` Richard W.M. Jones
2016-04-15 3:27 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.7 v2 06/17] gluster: " Fam Zheng
2016-04-15 12:24 ` [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-block] " Niels de Vos
2016-04-15 3:27 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.7 v2 07/17] rbd: Implement image locking Fam Zheng
2016-04-23 1:57 ` Jason Dillaman
2016-04-25 0:42 ` Fam Zheng
2016-04-26 15:42 ` Jason Dillaman
2016-04-27 0:20 ` Fam Zheng
2016-04-27 18:18 ` Jason Dillaman
2016-04-28 1:33 ` Fam Zheng
2016-04-15 3:27 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.7 v2 08/17] qemu-io: Add "-L" option for BDRV_O_NO_LOCK Fam Zheng
2016-04-16 13:46 ` Denis V. Lunev
2016-04-19 12:59 ` Fam Zheng
2016-04-15 3:27 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.7 v2 09/17] qemu-img: Add "-L" option to sub commands Fam Zheng
2016-04-16 14:29 ` Denis V. Lunev
2016-04-16 14:30 ` Denis V. Lunev
2016-04-19 12:59 ` Fam Zheng
2016-04-15 3:28 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.7 v2 10/17] qemu-img: Update documentation of "-L" option Fam Zheng
2016-04-15 3:28 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.7 v2 11/17] qemu-nbd: Add "--no-lock/-L" option Fam Zheng
2016-04-16 14:32 ` Denis V. Lunev
2016-04-19 12:58 ` Fam Zheng
2016-04-15 3:28 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.7 v2 12/17] qemu-iotests: 140: Disable image lock for qemu-io access Fam Zheng
2016-04-15 3:28 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.7 v2 13/17] qemu-iotests: 046: Move version detection out from verify_io Fam Zheng
2016-04-15 3:28 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.7 v2 14/17] qemu-iotests: Wait for QEMU processes before checking image in 091 Fam Zheng
2016-04-15 3:28 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.7 v2 15/17] qemu-iotests: Disable image lock when checking test image Fam Zheng
2016-04-15 3:28 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.7 v2 16/17] block: Turn on image locking by default Fam Zheng
2016-04-15 3:28 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.7 v2 17/17] qemu-iotests: Add test case 152 for image locking Fam Zheng
2016-04-16 14:33 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.7 v2 00/17] block: Lock images when opening Denis V. Lunev
2016-04-18 9:53 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2016-04-19 12:40 ` Fam Zheng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=57123CB3.9070803@openvz.org \
--to=den@openvz.org \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=eblake@redhat.com \
--cc=famz@redhat.com \
--cc=jcody@redhat.com \
--cc=jsnow@redhat.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).