From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47146) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1asDS3-0008RC-DP for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 18 Apr 2016 13:59:12 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1asDS0-0000dY-9M for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 18 Apr 2016 13:59:11 -0400 Received: from mail-lf0-x22e.google.com ([2a00:1450:4010:c07::22e]:34481) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1asDS0-0000cD-1A for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 18 Apr 2016 13:59:08 -0400 Received: by mail-lf0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id j11so226066798lfb.1 for ; Mon, 18 Apr 2016 10:59:07 -0700 (PDT) References: <1460324732-30330-1-git-send-email-sergey.fedorov@linaro.org> <1460324732-30330-4-git-send-email-sergey.fedorov@linaro.org> <87fuuix29q.fsf@linaro.org> From: Sergey Fedorov Message-ID: <57152069.4030803@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2016 20:59:05 +0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <87fuuix29q.fsf@linaro.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 03/10] tcg: Rearrange tb_link_page() to avoid forward declaration List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: =?UTF-8?Q?Alex_Benn=c3=a9e?= , Sergey Fedorov Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Paolo Bonzini , Peter Crosthwaite , Richard Henderson On 18/04/16 20:20, Alex Bennée wrote: > Sergey Fedorov writes: > >> From: Sergey Fedorov >> >> Signed-off-by: Sergey Fedorov >> Signed-off-by: Sergey Fedorov >> Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée > This clashes with the tcg clean-up patches. Should this series alway be > applied first? > I didn't try to combine those series. I thought it's not important which series comes first and it could be determined by the actual order of merging them into the mainline. If combining these series, I would like the direct block chaining clean-ups to come first. I can base the next respin of TCG clean-ups on top of this series, if desirable. Kind regards, Sergey