From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54771) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1asVhp-0003dW-Eu for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 19 Apr 2016 09:28:42 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1asVhm-0006WQ-6g for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 19 Apr 2016 09:28:41 -0400 Received: from e19.ny.us.ibm.com ([129.33.205.209]:43363) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1asVhm-0006Up-1R for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 19 Apr 2016 09:28:38 -0400 Received: from localhost by e19.ny.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Tue, 19 Apr 2016 09:28:36 -0400 Received: from b01cxnp22035.gho.pok.ibm.com (b01cxnp22035.gho.pok.ibm.com [9.57.198.25]) by d01dlp03.pok.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D97B0C90046 for ; Tue, 19 Apr 2016 09:28:29 -0400 (EDT) Received: from d01av04.pok.ibm.com (d01av04.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.64]) by b01cxnp22035.gho.pok.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id u3JDSZKH34013306 for ; Tue, 19 Apr 2016 13:28:35 GMT Received: from d01av04.pok.ibm.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by d01av04.pok.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id u3JDSZA8018752 for ; Tue, 19 Apr 2016 09:28:35 -0400 Reply-To: jjherne@linux.vnet.ibm.com References: <20160419063921.GA4735@grmbl.mre> From: "Jason J. Herne" Message-ID: <57163282.3040801@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2016 09:28:34 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160419063921.GA4735@grmbl.mre> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Move autoconverge out of experimental? List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Amit Shah Cc: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" , Juan Quintela , Jiri Denemark , Eric Blake , qemu list On 04/19/2016 02:39 AM, Amit Shah wrote: > Hi Jason, > > We've had the new autoconverge features enabled for a full release > now, what are your thoughts on dropping the x- ? > > Some factors I consider are direct user feedback, changes to the > functionality / API, and higher-level user feedback (like libvirt). I > believe libvirt is now using the new options, and they've not > complained. So we could be ready to drop the x- prefix. > > Thoughts? > > Amit > Hi Amit, Yes, I agree with you. We can probably drop the x-. The new autoconverge behavior was actually "in place" for the entire release. It was only the new commands to adjust throttling parameters that were marked as experimental. It is great that no one found any bugs. Let's hope it stays that way :) -- -- Jason J. Herne (jjherne@linux.vnet.ibm.com)