From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56751) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ateRW-0004nm-Ca for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 22 Apr 2016 13:00:35 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ateRS-00043n-E6 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 22 Apr 2016 13:00:34 -0400 Received: from mail-lf0-x242.google.com ([2a00:1450:4010:c07::242]:36854) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ateRS-00043X-46 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 22 Apr 2016 13:00:30 -0400 Received: by mail-lf0-x242.google.com with SMTP id y84so1038993lfc.3 for ; Fri, 22 Apr 2016 10:00:29 -0700 (PDT) References: <1461341333-19646-1-git-send-email-sergey.fedorov@linaro.org> <1461341333-19646-11-git-send-email-sergey.fedorov@linaro.org> <20160422164743.GA23711@aurel32.net> <20160422165159.GB23711@aurel32.net> From: Sergey Fedorov Message-ID: <571A58AA.9040502@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2016 20:00:26 +0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160422165159.GB23711@aurel32.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 10/11] tcg/mips: Make direct jump patching thread-safe List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Aurelien Jarno , Sergey Fedorov Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, =?UTF-8?Q?Alex_Benn=c3=a9e?= , Paolo Bonzini , Peter Crosthwaite , Richard Henderson On 22/04/16 19:51, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > On 2016-04-22 18:47, Aurelien Jarno wrote: >> On 2016-04-22 19:08, Sergey Fedorov wrote: >>> From: Sergey Fedorov >>> >>> Ensure direct jump patching in MIPS is atomic by using >>> atomic_read()/atomic_set() for code patching. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Sergey Fedorov >>> Signed-off-by: Sergey Fedorov >>> --- >>> >>> Changes in v2: >>> * s/atomic_write/atomic_set/ >>> >>> tcg/mips/tcg-target.inc.c | 3 ++- >>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/tcg/mips/tcg-target.inc.c b/tcg/mips/tcg-target.inc.c >>> index 682e19897db0..cefc0398018a 100644 >>> --- a/tcg/mips/tcg-target.inc.c >>> +++ b/tcg/mips/tcg-target.inc.c >>> @@ -1886,6 +1886,7 @@ static void tcg_target_init(TCGContext *s) >>> void tb_set_jmp_target1(uintptr_t jmp_addr, uintptr_t addr) >>> { >>> uint32_t *ptr = (uint32_t *)jmp_addr; >>> - *ptr = deposit32(*ptr, 0, 26, addr >> 2); >>> + uint32_t insn = atomic_read(ptr); >>> + atomic_set(ptr, deposit32(insn, 0, 26, addr >> 2)); >>> flush_icache_range(jmp_addr, jmp_addr + 4); >> Does it really make sense to read and write the value atomically? The >> resulting operation is still not atomic, something can happen in >> between. > Hmm, thinking more about that, given the only instruction used is "J", > we don't have to read the value, patch it and write it. We can directly > use something like (untested): > > atomic_set(ptr, (0x02 << 26) | (addr >> 2)); Hmm, looking at "case INDEX_op_goto_tb:" in tcg_out_op() again I'm thinking about: atomic_set(ptr, deposit32(OPC_J, 0, 26, addr >> 2)); Kind regards, Sergey